FBXL Social

Maybe I prefer the cringe SJWs to the channer sociopaths?

@thatguyoverthere They are useful categories in my experience. Not saying that everyone fits into one or the other of them necessarily.

You, for example, are not an SJW, and you don’t seem like a sociopath, but I could always be wrong about that.

@thatguyoverthere I've never met an SJW sociopath, but I'm happy to be corrected. I've met plenty of SJW reverse bigoted assholes though.

@thatguyoverthere (Just remembered why I didn't get on with them, although that still makes them orders of magnitude better people than the actual violent racists of, say, poa.st)

@thatguyoverthere sexist against men, racist against white people, etc

@thatguyoverthere Oh yeah, antifa, I forgot about them. Yes, I suppose those would count as SJW sociopaths.

By "violent racist" I meant someone who supports violent racism. I.e, someone who wants to do genocide or lynching or pogroms or anything like that.

@thatguyoverthere Right-wing paramilitary organizations exist too, you know. It's not just Antifa.

@thatguyoverthere Do you really mean to tell me that the far-right don't kill anyone? 🤔

@thatguyoverthere I'm not talking about anti-government militias for freedom, my friend. I'm talking about anti-government militias for fascism. And no, I don't mean fascism as in public-private partnerships. I mean fascism as in the Nazi kind. You've seen them. You've talked to them. You know what I'm talking about. Don't try to be smart with me.

@thatguyoverthere Poast users support actual fucking genocide and tyranny. If you for some reason didn't notice that I have no idea what to tell you.

@thatguyoverthere I see your point, but I still don't want to interact with those people. Hence why I'm asking myself whether I prefer the SJWs to the channers. Poast users are more Twitter than *chan but you get the idea.

However, what would you do about the ones that are serious?

Also, "people on all sides of the political spectrum kill people", I don't like left-wing violence either. Usually because they are anti freedom of belief.

Although, do antifa *kill* people? Or do they just through things at them. Breivik and co actually kill people.
I suppose that school shooting by the trans student counts. But I think it's more usual to throw cement-laden milkshakes.

If you're right about them being more weak-bodied than the far-right terrorists, then we should be less worried about them, don't you think?
replies
0
announces
0
likes
1

I'm not talking about "socialism" though. I'm talking about the violent and anti-freedom parts.

@thatguyoverthere Okay, I'll bite. Why is "war crimes" a "silly term"?

@thatguyoverthere
>make yourself a hard target
Me, personally, make myself a hard target? What about all the other people who are vulnerable?

>The ones that are more prone to violence are the ones who feel less secure
Gosh, what could we do about that? Can't be making them feel more secure. Nah, that's a silly idea.

@thatguyoverthere I do find it funny how you think everyone on the right who commits violence is a fed, but everyone on the left who commits violence is evil.

@thatguyoverthere Oh, you meant feel insecure from hate speech, I take it

@Diceynes @thatguyoverthere Well, maybe it should then, allistic.

@thatguyoverthere Don't talk to me.

@thatguyoverthere I agree, crimes are crimes, they don't become worse when there's certain kinds of speech involved.

@Diceynes @thatguyoverthere That's an argument against how they're considered/adjudicated/enforced, not an argument against the concept of a war crime itself.

@Diceynes @thatguyoverthere I'm talking about morals you retarded non-autistic sociopath, not egoistic bullshit.

@thatguyoverthere Some people are insecure for very good reason though. I.e, they are the target of oppressive laws or violence.