At the hearing, Assange admitted a felony charge of conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defence information.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crgggyvp0j9o
This doesn’t look very good to me.
@thatguyoverthere I see your point, but I still don't want to interact with those people. Hence why I'm asking myself whether I prefer the SJWs to the channers. Poast users are more Twitter than *chan but you get the idea.
However, what would you do about the ones that are serious?
Also, "people on all sides of the political spectrum kill people", I don't like left-wing violence either. Usually because they are anti freedom of belief.
Although, do antifa *kill* people? Or do they just through things at them. Breivik and co actually kill people.
I suppose that school shooting by the trans student counts. But I think it's more usual to throw cement-laden milkshakes.
If you're right about them being more weak-bodied than the far-right terrorists, then we should be less worried about them, don't you think?
However, what would you do about the ones that are serious?
Also, "people on all sides of the political spectrum kill people", I don't like left-wing violence either. Usually because they are anti freedom of belief.
Although, do antifa *kill* people? Or do they just through things at them. Breivik and co actually kill people.
I suppose that school shooting by the trans student counts. But I think it's more usual to throw cement-laden milkshakes.
If you're right about them being more weak-bodied than the far-right terrorists, then we should be less worried about them, don't you think?
Why People Prefer More Pain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4r71kEdYME
The conclusion to this feels manipulative and somewhat dystopian.
I also don't get the first experiment. The water was warmer in the longer, supposedly worse case; how can you compare the two scenarios?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4r71kEdYME
The conclusion to this feels manipulative and somewhat dystopian.
I also don't get the first experiment. The water was warmer in the longer, supposedly worse case; how can you compare the two scenarios?
Flying To Catch SpaceX Rocket Launch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4OFeM10sAA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4OFeM10sAA
@thatguyoverthere Poast users support actual fucking genocide and tyranny. If you for some reason didn't notice that I have no idea what to tell you.
@thatguyoverthere I'm not talking about anti-government militias for freedom, my friend. I'm talking about anti-government militias for fascism. And no, I don't mean fascism as in public-private partnerships. I mean fascism as in the Nazi kind. You've seen them. You've talked to them. You know what I'm talking about. Don't try to be smart with me.
@thatguyoverthere Do you really mean to tell me that the far-right don't kill anyone? 🤔

@thatguyoverthere Right-wing paramilitary organizations exist too, you know. It's not just Antifa.
@thatguyoverthere Oh yeah, antifa, I forgot about them. Yes, I suppose those would count as SJW sociopaths.
By "violent racist" I meant someone who supports violent racism. I.e, someone who wants to do genocide or lynching or pogroms or anything like that.
By "violent racist" I meant someone who supports violent racism. I.e, someone who wants to do genocide or lynching or pogroms or anything like that.
@thatguyoverthere sexist against men, racist against white people, etc
@icedquinn I mean, sometimes you need to kill to stop further or worse evil. But I know that's not all Stirner believed.
@thatguyoverthere (Just remembered why I didn't get on with them, although that still makes them orders of magnitude better people than the actual violent racists of, say, poa.st)
@thatguyoverthere I've never met an SJW sociopath, but I'm happy to be corrected. I've met plenty of SJW reverse bigoted assholes though.
@thatguyoverthere They are useful categories in my experience. Not saying that everyone fits into one or the other of them necessarily.
You, for example, are not an SJW, and you don’t seem like a sociopath, but I could always be wrong about that.
@niconiconi So it's an alternative explanation of the same observations? What's wrong with that?