This dumb wetback bitch is apparently unaware that the President has been openly drone murdering Americans without due process since Saint Obama
Rather than using dumb questions, I suggest she go review the history of the idea of the sovereign and the King'a absolute immunity for acts he himself commits by his own hand.
@Humpleupagus You're assuming that tamale maker even knows how to read
The political question doctrine comes to mind, as well as the tax payer standing doctrine.
There may also be situations under the 11th Amendment where a state may violate federal law, but not be subject to federal jurisdiction.
The answer is "yes." BTW.
@caekislove
I guess she never read Eric Holder's memo.
@Humpleupagus @sj_zero @GenesRus You seem to know the law pretty well. I wish you were on the Supreme Court instead of these DEI appointees who think that the Bill of Rights was never meant to "hamstring the government".
>no we don’t see those drone strike on us cit as a problem
I hope this lispy fag gets tainted aids meds from some based changs.
@sargoysmuck @Humpleupagus @GenesRus Yeah it makes me want to throw up in my pocket every time USA politicians talk about "the rule of law". Oh, like drone striking your own people because you're afraid of jury nullification? Oh, like seizing the assets of every Russian citizen dumb enough to invest in America?
@sargoysmuck @Humpleupagus @GenesRus Not even getting into the sick shit USA "allies" do like sawing off the arms and legs of dissidents and carpet-bombing women and children.
@sargoysmuck @Humpleupagus @GenesRus Yeah, I can't think of a single instance in the 20th/21st century where the USA alliance were the good guys.
The president is basically immune to every federal law except in cases of literal impeachment. And that’s not a criminal trial. It’s essentially an HR incident
@caekislove @GenesRus
@leyonhjelm @Humpleupagus @GenesRus "Should the President be basically immune to every federal law?" was a question the Founding Fathers never conceived of since they went to extreme lengths to limit the actual powers of the President.
The federal government was intended to be neutered and administrative
@Humpleupagus @GenesRus
@Humpleupagus @leyonhjelm @GenesRus Absolutely. The idea was that if people didn't like the laws of their state they could just move. The notion of federal supremacy came much later.
@Humpleupagus @leyonhjelm @GenesRus Quite frankly, it would have been simpler and cleaner if they had just enthroned the Washington Dynasty.
@Humpleupagus @leyonhjelm @GenesRus Yeah, because the Bill of Rights was not a list of rights that citizens enjoyed, but was rather a limitation on the powers of the government.
Hence “rights”. These are specifically there to limit the federal government
@Humpleupagus @GenesRus
@leyonhjelm @Humpleupagus @GenesRus It should have been called "The List of Limitations on Federal Power"
That’s what a bill of rights meant until they skewed the language
@Humpleupagus @GenesRus
@leyonhjelm @Humpleupagus @GenesRus Next time we need to make it more explicit AND also limit everything to Whites.
They will always find a way to ruin it if people tolerate their efforts
@Humpleupagus @GenesRus
NO NIGGERS
NO JEWS