These people are FUCKING INSANE
The frameworks of public health ethics require balancing the expected utility with the promotion or demotion of other values. One of these values is liberty. A covert compulsory moral bioenhance‐ ment program is less liberty‐restricting than a similar overt program is. The discussion above points out that if the moral bioenhancement program were overt, inevitably some people would refuse or otherwise fail to receive the intervention. Because the program is compulsory, however, policies would be required to compel such people to undergo the intervention. These policies would take the form of isolation (e.g., preventing dissenters from fully participating in society), taxes or fees as penalties, or, in severe cases, imprisonment. All of these methods of compulsion restrict liberties.
That has got to be the most retarded “libertarian” argument I have ever seen.
But of course that's still bad because it's against people's will.
If you suspect something is going to happen, say that you suspect it.
If you think you know something for sure, say that you know it for sure.
If someone has admitted that they are doing / will do something, link to or otherwise source that admission.
And you should tell people all the relevant details about what you are saying. Don't just try to shock them.