The Kennedy thing is wild, by fighting for RFKjr the Kennedy legacy has been taken from the democrats. And for what? because RFKjr was anti-vaxx.
Is he actually "anti-vax" or does he just want to be able to ask some questions?
(I haven't followed his positions closely)
(I haven't followed his positions closely)
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 2
@threalist a good question, I say this because the regime painted anyone who had reservations as "anti-vaxx"
He has said that black people should be put on a different vaccination schedule due to their race, so he's not "anti-vaccination" but skeptical.
He has said that black people should be put on a different vaccination schedule due to their race, so he's not "anti-vaccination" but skeptical.
@sickburnbro @threalist 9mm at age 13 is a good vaxx schedule for blacks
@sickburnbro @threalist i think rand put it the best
we just want choices, we want to be able to say hey my kid doesn't need two hep b shots at 1 year old, he isn't going to be shooting dope and banging hookers, paraphrasing.
but right now schools, not doctors, are the ones who can mandate this shit, and its all hinged around diseases that are either brought in by foreigners or spread by degenerates, so why does my kid need products with heavy metals from companies that have no liability?
also its hilarious that these companies can claim their products are safe with no proof, that'd be like a car maker saying their shit is safe but the thing crumples when you lean on it
its just societal mental illness that we're laboring under
we just want choices, we want to be able to say hey my kid doesn't need two hep b shots at 1 year old, he isn't going to be shooting dope and banging hookers, paraphrasing.
but right now schools, not doctors, are the ones who can mandate this shit, and its all hinged around diseases that are either brought in by foreigners or spread by degenerates, so why does my kid need products with heavy metals from companies that have no liability?
also its hilarious that these companies can claim their products are safe with no proof, that'd be like a car maker saying their shit is safe but the thing crumples when you lean on it
its just societal mental illness that we're laboring under
@dictatordave @threalist it's dumb because the schools mandate it, but then say they aren't responsible, they are just following recommendations, and then the doctors say they aren't responsible, and are just issuing "recommendations"
@BasedLord @sickburnbro @threalist its malpractice, all of it
they can claim immunity or just following recommendations but it doesn't mean they shouldn't swing, along with their families
there's zero consequences for these 'professionals' that for some stupid reason the idiot public simply trusts
they can claim immunity or just following recommendations but it doesn't mean they shouldn't swing, along with their families
there's zero consequences for these 'professionals' that for some stupid reason the idiot public simply trusts
@dictatordave @BasedLord @threalist The interesting thing is that while things were going well enough, people were OK to let these groups not take responsibility, but things are not well enough anymore.
@sickburnbro @BasedLord @threalist exactly, and its funny how the 'i follow the science(tm)' crowd wants to ignore a mountain of data, and ai's saying that all this shit adds up to bad policy and bad advice
i'd be more inclined to believe the medical establishment if they weren't constantly in the top 3 reasons for death annually
i'd be more inclined to believe the medical establishment if they weren't constantly in the top 3 reasons for death annually
I was in the hospital with my mom in 2/2020 heard them reading a memo out loud. CDC recommended things. By April no appointments or anything. By the time reached 8/2020 full lockdown with that memo recommendation I heard read. Knew something big about to happen. Then 2021 Biden banging on the Podium.
@DMA @dictatordave @threalist Yeah, they are going to regret saying they hoped everyone would die.
@ChadleyDudebro he seems to be the 90s democrat style which is essentially "we need it for rape and stuff like that"
At this point, removing a federal "right" to abortion and letting states decide is the most effective option.
At this point, removing a federal "right" to abortion and letting states decide is the most effective option.
@sickburnbro @threalist His position, from what I can tell, is actually a pretty sneaky one. Sneaky in the sense that it gets him through the gatekeepers (mostly), but probably gets the antivaxxers (including me) what we want. They vigorously attack him knowing damn well that he has never once said he is against vaccines, but are deathly afraid of opening the books. It's that usual government supremacist attitude that kicks in. Don't you dare expose to the world how untrustworthy we are, because then you will destroy trust in government. No shit, Sherlock, but trust is earned, and if you have been untrustworthy, you don't deserve trust. It's in actual government records that are public (which I can probably dig up if anyone is interested), from the 1970s, that no opinion against vaccines must be allowed to propagate, *even if true*.
He has repeatedly said he is not antivaxx, but that he just wants 'safe' vaccines. He said he fought to get mercury out of fish (which I think he considers a lost cause, now), but no-one ever called him anti-fish. But he's also hinted that he doesn't think any vaccines can be made safe. So by demanding transparency and actual studies using actual placebos (rather than deceptively using other vaccines, or a shot with all the same adjuvants and other ingredients, but no antigen), and demonstrating the dangers conclusively, the crap will be taken off the market. He knows damn well that honest research will kill trust in vaccines, at least as concocted in the past 150+ years, as well it should.
Vaccine R&D and continued release of new shots won't be prohibited, but once the public gets a taste of what's been done to us, much like the USAID revelations, they'll demand more actual testing and transparency. It's a Pandora's Box that can't be closed.
There are a lot of idiots in the 'health freedom' moment that I've stopped paying attention to because they think this admin, including RFK, Jr. has pivioted. It might be true, but they are making assertions without understanding anything about strategy. I don't think there's been a pivot at all. Anti-Big Fooders and Anti-Vaxxers at each others throats, so-to-speak, when they don't need to be. Look at Trump's EO on MAHA put out yesterday and it doesn't say a word about vaccines. If it did, it might kill the movement in its crib. But it's rife with comments like 'transparency' and 'bring honest science back', etc. Again. Get it by the gatekeepers, but get to the destination you want.
He has repeatedly said he is not antivaxx, but that he just wants 'safe' vaccines. He said he fought to get mercury out of fish (which I think he considers a lost cause, now), but no-one ever called him anti-fish. But he's also hinted that he doesn't think any vaccines can be made safe. So by demanding transparency and actual studies using actual placebos (rather than deceptively using other vaccines, or a shot with all the same adjuvants and other ingredients, but no antigen), and demonstrating the dangers conclusively, the crap will be taken off the market. He knows damn well that honest research will kill trust in vaccines, at least as concocted in the past 150+ years, as well it should.
Vaccine R&D and continued release of new shots won't be prohibited, but once the public gets a taste of what's been done to us, much like the USAID revelations, they'll demand more actual testing and transparency. It's a Pandora's Box that can't be closed.
There are a lot of idiots in the 'health freedom' moment that I've stopped paying attention to because they think this admin, including RFK, Jr. has pivioted. It might be true, but they are making assertions without understanding anything about strategy. I don't think there's been a pivot at all. Anti-Big Fooders and Anti-Vaxxers at each others throats, so-to-speak, when they don't need to be. Look at Trump's EO on MAHA put out yesterday and it doesn't say a word about vaccines. If it did, it might kill the movement in its crib. But it's rife with comments like 'transparency' and 'bring honest science back', etc. Again. Get it by the gatekeepers, but get to the destination you want.
@totalslothdeath @threalist I think the biggest thing is he has an older style view of the government in that he thinks HHS should protect the citizens from big businesses, such that he is willing to take a skeptical view of what big pharma has done.
@dictatordave @sickburnbro @threalist the arguments I've gotten into with the witch-doctors is unbelievable, and showed what sort of money-grubbing, unethical, checkbox technicians they are.
First kid, within 12 hours at hospital, some pregnant slant comes in to tell us kid needs Hep B vaccine. I tell her we are going thru pediatrician for everything, no thanks. She starts in, lecturing how important it is. I repeat myself, and dismiss her. She goes in AGAIN why that's the wrong decision. I interrupted her with something to the effect "the kid isn't shooting up or having ass sex between now and tomorrow, it'll be fine" before she finally left. Hospital still charged us $150 for "vaccine counciling".
Second kid had a bad reaction to RV (Rotovitus). Come to find out this disease is only spread thru infected kids poop. But it's given to kids 3 times in their first year and only "protects" for the first year. Kid was running 104 fever, puking all night, and the only things the pediatricians office would say is "keep giving milk and Tylenol, and we'll probably skip the 3rd dose".
We had a couple more bad experiences with the pediatrician and staff pushing shots against our directions. Finally got a good NP that comes to our house as a pediatrician, doesn't push anything.
When doctors are held to actual informed consent, the vaccine industry is going to come to an abrupt halt. There's still going to be bad parents that'll look at the laundry list of serious side effects in the insert, same parents giving kids puberty blockers. But it's going to be an awakening for a lot in the middle just trying to do what we're told is the right thing.
First kid, within 12 hours at hospital, some pregnant slant comes in to tell us kid needs Hep B vaccine. I tell her we are going thru pediatrician for everything, no thanks. She starts in, lecturing how important it is. I repeat myself, and dismiss her. She goes in AGAIN why that's the wrong decision. I interrupted her with something to the effect "the kid isn't shooting up or having ass sex between now and tomorrow, it'll be fine" before she finally left. Hospital still charged us $150 for "vaccine counciling".
Second kid had a bad reaction to RV (Rotovitus). Come to find out this disease is only spread thru infected kids poop. But it's given to kids 3 times in their first year and only "protects" for the first year. Kid was running 104 fever, puking all night, and the only things the pediatricians office would say is "keep giving milk and Tylenol, and we'll probably skip the 3rd dose".
We had a couple more bad experiences with the pediatrician and staff pushing shots against our directions. Finally got a good NP that comes to our house as a pediatrician, doesn't push anything.
When doctors are held to actual informed consent, the vaccine industry is going to come to an abrupt halt. There's still going to be bad parents that'll look at the laundry list of serious side effects in the insert, same parents giving kids puberty blockers. But it's going to be an awakening for a lot in the middle just trying to do what we're told is the right thing.
@EnnaComa @sickburnbro @threalist it is wild how exercising your parental rights causes them to throw a fit
we did the same thing, told them no thanks to stuff at the hospital and we just tell the pediatrician that we're good for now, or telling them they just got over a cold usually is a low key 'fuck off'
its so annoying that these charlatans still think they have a leg to stand on when its current year and i can read the white papers on the poison they want to push before we get there for the sales pitch
hopefully pharma is brought to heel and will leave us all alone and stop trying to make our kids retarded
we did the same thing, told them no thanks to stuff at the hospital and we just tell the pediatrician that we're good for now, or telling them they just got over a cold usually is a low key 'fuck off'
its so annoying that these charlatans still think they have a leg to stand on when its current year and i can read the white papers on the poison they want to push before we get there for the sales pitch
hopefully pharma is brought to heel and will leave us all alone and stop trying to make our kids retarded
@sickburnbro @threalist to be fair, any actual honest investigation of the vaccine industry that looks at long term health results of the vaxxed vs unvaxxed is going to result in the destruction of the industry, thats why they freak out so hard when anybody pushes back, the whole thing is a house of cards predicated on nobody ever doing the hard number studies with actual neutral placebos instead of using adjuvant mixes
@sickburnbro @threalist Speaking of retardery...he probably hasn't even moved into his office, yet, and here's another one claiming a major reversal based on one interview (presumably with the MSM, which can't be trusted, either):
https://thenewamerican.com/us/healthcare/rfk-jr-dismis...
Others have said it, and I'm sure RFK, Jr. has said it. VAERS is entirely corrupted due to their refusal to followup and the ridiculously low reporting rate. But it's the only data that we have. Saying we don't have reliable data, and yet referencing it (since it's what 'The System' depends on), is not a contradiction when it is the only data you have.
https://thenewamerican.com/us/healthcare/rfk-jr-dismis...
Others have said it, and I'm sure RFK, Jr. has said it. VAERS is entirely corrupted due to their refusal to followup and the ridiculously low reporting rate. But it's the only data that we have. Saying we don't have reliable data, and yet referencing it (since it's what 'The System' depends on), is not a contradiction when it is the only data you have.