Casey Muratori (@MollyRocket ) - Digital Due Process
https://odysee.com/@FUTO:e/casey-muratori-(-mollyrocket-)-digital:b
https://odysee.com/@FUTO:e/casey-muratori-(-mollyrocket-)-digital:b
This is an interesting and insightful talk. And the idea is definitely good. But it can't be the whole story IMO.
Just making sure the rules are clear and there's due process isn't enough. Not everyone can agree on what the rules *should be*. And democracy isn't a solution either. It's too collectivistic.
If a site, say, bans anything that contradicts the scientific consensus (even if they are very clear about what that means and follow all these due process rules), there should be an outlet for people who want to be able to do that, and that can only be solved (AFAICS) by competition of rulesets and enforcers. This is the case even if a majority of people voted for that rule.
Just making sure the rules are clear and there's due process isn't enough. Not everyone can agree on what the rules *should be*. And democracy isn't a solution either. It's too collectivistic.
If a site, say, bans anything that contradicts the scientific consensus (even if they are very clear about what that means and follow all these due process rules), there should be an outlet for people who want to be able to do that, and that can only be solved (AFAICS) by competition of rulesets and enforcers. This is the case even if a majority of people voted for that rule.
I think the speaker is talking about services adopting these features voluntarily because that's what the users want.
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 1