FBXL Social

> according to a NASA person I spoke to last year, any government agency has to have a contract with an entity in order to use a platform. He said they can’t figure out who at “Mastodon” to would give them a contract and assume liability.

smells like bullshit, who signed their contract for www.nasa.gov

"Abigail Bowman, Web Modernization Lead and Web Services Chief, NASA"

@smug I mean with who, who is assuming "legal liability for supporting HTTP"

It's not for supporting http, it's who they can ring up if "nasa.gov" (or rather "nasa.fedi") goes down or has issues or gets leaked and no, it can't be a John Doe living at Sampleroad 5.

@smug that's just sysadmin stuff.

Well that's the whole point. You could sell fediverse on the government and have them have a server if you told them about butterfly (graf's and pasture's service).

@sun No, this is a thing, sadly. Many moons ago I tried to get Notepad++ approved for NIPR, but since the gov wants someone they can sue if something breaks, it never went anywhere.

@RegalBeagle it's just interestingly selective because they don't have somebody on the line for Apache web server, they just pay a sysadmin.

@sun For networked services, all that goes through contractors. They lease rack space in a datacenter or host in govCloud and get paid based on meeting SLAs. Almost always easier going that route than creating a program that runs on the end user's machine. DoD had a massive cloud boner back when I was in.

"it's bullshit that I can't sue my text editor"

@sj_zero @RegalBeagle I am sure too that the government has never sued microsoft for outages, they probably just use outages to negotiate for cheaper licensing

They can't even sue Microsoft to pay all their taxes.
replies
0
announces
0
likes
0