FBXL Social

So I just had a neat thought as to how the US could help solve several problems at once.

Something like 50% of land in the west is owned by the federal government. Look up a map of it, it's nuts.

Just sell the land.

1. Massive money immediately
2. Lots of land to build new homes or industrial plants or whatever, probably a baby boomers and an economic bump
3. Reduced overhead from having to deal with all that land

A new wild west.
replies
6
announces
0
likes
2

@sj_zero sure you had the thought all by yourself?

Post by Jeremy Kaufman on Twitter: “ The federal government owns 27% of all land in America.

DOGE should study the economic benefits of privatizing more of it.”

@sj_zero Sorry, but money is not the problem. It can be, and it has been, printed more. And thus they inflated the value of everything and can purchase more land to be parked or sold to (((investors))), because keeping the land productive will not create the food shortage they are after.

@collectifission @sj_zero
how much of this land are national parks, reservations and desert?

I'm only on the fediverse so yes. But I guess it's just that obvious lol

@sj_zero The ((( Goverment )))) could 'fix' 'homeless' if it ACTUALLY wanted

How Governments Could Save the World (If They Cared) odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/HowGovernmentsCouldSavetheWorldIfTheyCared:9

The Truth About Governments odysee.com/@EricDubay:c/thetruthaboutgovernments:5

If doing so, it would make the most sense selling off in very small increments and on a random schedule.

Oh, yeah so you don't crash the global land market. Good point.

Public lands have a long history as cash cows & corp welfare via resource extraction leases that give taxpayers pennies on the dollar for energy, timber & minerals under Dept of Interior.. next the current vacant housing stock held by Blackrock and ilk could give every homeless person two homes so supply is not the problem either.. massive theft & corruption is what needs fixing.

@sj_zero it does seem simple, but...

A huge proportion of this land is desert, frozen tundra or otherwise not easily inhabited by humans.

Development of marginal land is one of the reasons why wildfires have been running rampant over the American West in recent years and also one of the major reasons why there are critical water shortages across the southwest. Developing even more marginal land would make those issues worse.

Does the government need to own it? No. But someone else has to want it for some use that makes sense in order for this plan to be in any way workable.