FBXL Social

Hyolobrika (left) | @Hyolobrika@social.fbxl.net

Predator of cinnamon rolls

How does that even work as a pretext anyway? How does a cyberattack imply CBDCs?

It's free as in software, not as in beer.

Engage with the Review on Twitter

Lol

gluten? in water?

Using Agregore Mobile, I meant to say

@mauve do you know why I'm getting a "Cannot connect to IPFS" error with ipns://social.defluencer.eth/ ?

Isn't it great knowing there might be a nuclear war in the future?

Maybe I got some details wrong but you get the gist of what I'm saying, I hope

https://mastodon.social/@Mrfunkedude/112276758023113028
These people are so much better than most people here in so many ways.
It's a shame that they are also anti-white, anti-male, etc, as well as highly dogmatic about science and politics.

I guess no community is perfect.

"Waaaaah! Waaaaaaah! People are different from me!"

Maybe he hasn't found anyone to join it yet

You're welcome!

It's so sad that I can't do maths anymore.
Everyone used to say I was good at it.

This is an interesting and insightful talk. And the idea is definitely good. But it can't be the whole story IMO.
Just making sure the rules are clear and there's due process isn't enough. Not everyone can agree on what the rules *should be*. And democracy isn't a solution either. It's too collectivistic.
If a site, say, bans anything that contradicts the scientific consensus (even if they are very clear about what that means and follow all these due process rules), there should be an outlet for people who want to be able to do that, and that can only be solved (AFAICS) by competition of rulesets and enforcers. This is the case even if a majority of people voted for that rule.

Casey Muratori (@MollyRocket ) - Digital Due Process
https://odysee.com/@FUTO:e/casey-muratori-(-mollyrocket-)-digital:b

Did you know that "extra virgin" olive oil can legally contain as much as 0.05% cum?

"PrOtEcT thE InTeGRiTY of AuStrALia'S BanKinG SYstEM"

ยป