https://youtu.be/JDtsOcaSq4A
Imagine for a second what's actually going on here.
You have governments that specifically implement policies that cause mental health issues. The destruction of the nuclear family we know causes mental health issues. This is not up for debate, the data is overwhelming.
In the story Tim talks about, isis was basically created by government policy in the west, and further enabled by policies essentially crafted to deny the existence of isis, obviously not directly but indirectly.
So you have all of these policies that specifically and directly create mental health issues, then you have the government implementing euthanasia for mental health issues.
These people want to call us ontologically evil, perhaps that's because they've mistaken their mirror for a window.
Imagine for a second what's actually going on here.
You have governments that specifically implement policies that cause mental health issues. The destruction of the nuclear family we know causes mental health issues. This is not up for debate, the data is overwhelming.
In the story Tim talks about, isis was basically created by government policy in the west, and further enabled by policies essentially crafted to deny the existence of isis, obviously not directly but indirectly.
So you have all of these policies that specifically and directly create mental health issues, then you have the government implementing euthanasia for mental health issues.
These people want to call us ontologically evil, perhaps that's because they've mistaken their mirror for a window.
That's one of my pet peeves is seeing people complaining about a "lack of flexibility" in the economy, usually related to the ability to create dodgy fintech to make massive amounts of money without ever coming close to adding any actual value to the economy.
Yeah, absolutely. It's a social science and not a hard science so the things involved aren't laws of physics but identified patterns in the data over decades and centuries. But just as you said, these people aren't suggesting a new model. They're just rejecting their own models because this week they're not consistent with the story they want to tell.
It's the same as "A recession is two quarters of economic decline just kidding recessions only exist when we say it exists and it doesn't exist because that would be stagflation which would be incredibly inconvenient for us"
It's the same as "A recession is two quarters of economic decline just kidding recessions only exist when we say it exists and it doesn't exist because that would be stagflation which would be incredibly inconvenient for us"
That's something that blows me away, that these people are basically lying about the fundamentals written in every macroeconomics textbook. It isn't some alt-right version of economics that talks about the effects of interest rates, reserve requirements, and QE on prices, it's the normal course every economist had to take.
They are also lying about stagflation, and they aren't doing anything to prepare the world for the fact that stagflation is one of the most difficult economic conditions to deal with.
They are also lying about stagflation, and they aren't doing anything to prepare the world for the fact that stagflation is one of the most difficult economic conditions to deal with.
Isn't it wonderful that england has no problems right now whatsoever so all they have left is mean posts on the Internet?
That's sort of my point. They're trying to appeal to certain people as part of the trick, but if they get everything they ask for what they really get is world domination by the elite class.
Sun Tzu says that a wise general will choose the battlefield. You can decide to attack where you enemy is weak and you are strong, you can pick battles where even if you lose you don't lose because you are facing an enemy already defeated.
The art of war is the art of deception. Where you are weak you want to appear strong, and when you are strong you want to appear weak.
In this sense, it makes sense for the rich to take up marxist causes twisted to suit their ends. They have chosen a battlefield where if they win, then their twisted form of marxism which says you must support megacorps and the establishment becomes law and they win; and if they lose then marxism loses and the megacorps see one of their ideological opposites fail and they win.
This is where populism becomes a dirty word. Populism is defined as separating the world into the common people and the elites and saying that the power should be held by the common people instead of the elites. Marxism should be populist, but they chose the battlefield so they're actually pushing a self serving non-populist marxism, and they're trying to set it up so it's non-populist marxism vs non-populist conservatism, and if it appears that someone is calling for people to have power over their own lives then both groups are supposed to attack that evil populist. That's how you end up with democrats and "normal republicans" and the Lincoln project types vs. the "evil" maga republicans.
The art of war is the art of deception. Where you are weak you want to appear strong, and when you are strong you want to appear weak.
In this sense, it makes sense for the rich to take up marxist causes twisted to suit their ends. They have chosen a battlefield where if they win, then their twisted form of marxism which says you must support megacorps and the establishment becomes law and they win; and if they lose then marxism loses and the megacorps see one of their ideological opposites fail and they win.
This is where populism becomes a dirty word. Populism is defined as separating the world into the common people and the elites and saying that the power should be held by the common people instead of the elites. Marxism should be populist, but they chose the battlefield so they're actually pushing a self serving non-populist marxism, and they're trying to set it up so it's non-populist marxism vs non-populist conservatism, and if it appears that someone is calling for people to have power over their own lives then both groups are supposed to attack that evil populist. That's how you end up with democrats and "normal republicans" and the Lincoln project types vs. the "evil" maga republicans.
One thing a lot of people don't realize is that the biggest regulators on the planet are not governments, but insurance companies.
You can eventually be doing enough to follow the law, but if you do everything the insurance companies ask, they'll make up more shit the next year, they'll invent new shit, because they don't want to pay out any more than they absolutely have to.
You can eventually be doing enough to follow the law, but if you do everything the insurance companies ask, they'll make up more shit the next year, they'll invent new shit, because they don't want to pay out any more than they absolutely have to.
holy shit I was looking for a certain image, and found this more web 1.0 than web 1.0 website:
http://www.sherylfranklin.com/trek_bones.html
Someone is paying to keep this site online!
http://www.sherylfranklin.com/trek_bones.html
Someone is paying to keep this site online!
HELLO FELLOW GLOBALISTS! DO YOU NOT WISH TO COMMIT CRIMES WITH ME? LET US GO BOMB A GOVERNMENT BUILDING OR TWO!
Preaching to the choir. Why do you think I ended up on fediverse in the first place?
Hi folks,
Nick Rekieta, a lawyer who got his start streaming ridiculous lawsuits and today covers a lot of law and culture stuff as well, got banned from youtube for bullshit reasons. For folks who haven't heard about him, check him out on rumble or odysee.
I've been following him for years and supporting through patreon, newproject2 ( @dick 's canceled patreon alternative), subscribestar, and eventually locals. He's a streaming machine, does a ton of live shows most weeks, you couldn't possibly catch up with all the content he's got, but he's fun to watch and especially to have on in the corner while you're doing other stuff. Check him out, it's a moment he could really use some support.
https://rumble.com/c/RekietaLaw
Nick Rekieta, a lawyer who got his start streaming ridiculous lawsuits and today covers a lot of law and culture stuff as well, got banned from youtube for bullshit reasons. For folks who haven't heard about him, check him out on rumble or odysee.
I've been following him for years and supporting through patreon, newproject2 ( @dick 's canceled patreon alternative), subscribestar, and eventually locals. He's a streaming machine, does a ton of live shows most weeks, you couldn't possibly catch up with all the content he's got, but he's fun to watch and especially to have on in the corner while you're doing other stuff. Check him out, it's a moment he could really use some support.
https://rumble.com/c/RekietaLaw
The most important key is that most of these people refused the call of parenthood, so they only kids they can hurt are our kids. That's why they want our kids, because they know their terrible legacy would end with them otherwise.