What's interesting is that it was established long before the DMCA that copyright is NOT supposed to establish new property rights on devices after sale. There was a court case I think in the 1980s with garage door openers, and the supreme court made it pretty clear as I recall that you don't get to use copyright to give yourself property rights to a device you've already sold.
The story I heard, and I don't know how true it is, but it's that Walt Disney the man grew up in the south around many blacks, and that's where he got the ideas that he put in there. Rather than being some hateful attack on blacks, it's a representation of a culture that existed at the time.
Something's been bothering me for a while: when something is represented basically accurately, it's called racist. The only "not racist" thing is to have every person from another culture act like they've been living in Southern California for the past 4 generations.
It seems to me that for all the talk of "white supremacy" in every other facet of all societies around the world, when it comes to mass media centered around Southern California, people of every race, creed, and color are only allowed to act exactly like white Californians or face erasure. Even "ethnic representation" seems to just end up being white people dipped in different strengths of tea. You have to talk like they do, act like they do, think like they do, agree with all their political opinions, and then and only then are you allowed to be "representation" in media.
But hey, I'm just a redneck from northern Canada, so what do I know?
Something's been bothering me for a while: when something is represented basically accurately, it's called racist. The only "not racist" thing is to have every person from another culture act like they've been living in Southern California for the past 4 generations.
It seems to me that for all the talk of "white supremacy" in every other facet of all societies around the world, when it comes to mass media centered around Southern California, people of every race, creed, and color are only allowed to act exactly like white Californians or face erasure. Even "ethnic representation" seems to just end up being white people dipped in different strengths of tea. You have to talk like they do, act like they do, think like they do, agree with all their political opinions, and then and only then are you allowed to be "representation" in media.
But hey, I'm just a redneck from northern Canada, so what do I know?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3On097nE78
When I listen to songs like this, it's hard to escape a conclusion that a lot of american rock and roll is copy pasted right from african music.
The only problem is that this was recorded in the 1960, so was it modified for contemporary mainstream audiences who wanted american rock and roll? If that was the case, then you can't really draw any conclusions.
When I listen to songs like this, it's hard to escape a conclusion that a lot of american rock and roll is copy pasted right from african music.
The only problem is that this was recorded in the 1960, so was it modified for contemporary mainstream audiences who wanted american rock and roll? If that was the case, then you can't really draw any conclusions.
So let's change it around a bit. Instead of "the public", let's say "the other property owners whose enjoyment of a property is harmed by the actions of the one person".
I think of that one property development in New Jersey that ended up being the former location of a company's secret toxic waste dump. Besides the homeowners being harmed by brutal toxic waste, their property is entirely useless after it was discovered. Best of all, the company that dumped the waste had long since gone out of business so it just sucks to be them. I think it was the federal government who picked up the tab ultimately for that, which is no better -- great, people who didn't have anything to do with New Jersey ended up helping pay for a new house for someone because someone else dumped toxic waste in a spot.
I think of that one property development in New Jersey that ended up being the former location of a company's secret toxic waste dump. Besides the homeowners being harmed by brutal toxic waste, their property is entirely useless after it was discovered. Best of all, the company that dumped the waste had long since gone out of business so it just sucks to be them. I think it was the federal government who picked up the tab ultimately for that, which is no better -- great, people who didn't have anything to do with New Jersey ended up helping pay for a new house for someone because someone else dumped toxic waste in a spot.
I want to push back against that a little.
I agree that some elements of the current environmental movement seems more interested in micromanaging your life than doing anything meaningful for the environment, but there's a lot of elements of it which are totally reasonable and good.
If we let some people get their way, the entire continent would look more polluted than Beijing. There was an image posted a while back of a slaughterhouse that turned the river it was next to into a nightmare of fat and entrails and rejected animal carcasses, and it wasn't until someone with the power stepped in to do so and forced them to stop it that the river was recovered for the public's use. That sort of abuse is a liberty issue as well. If companies can just destroy our shared environment and at the end of it just go out of business that's a problem.
This is one of those cases where a balance needs to be found between the rights of the people as a whole to the enjoyment of the waterway in a pristine form and the rights of the individual trying to enjoy their own property by running a factory of some sort. I don't think the question should be "environmentalism: yes or no?", but a more nuanced "where is the line that best balances the rights of the people and the rights of individual property owners?"
And on a completely different tangent, the fact that they lock down our factories but allow products built in factories that are more than happy to destroy the global ecosystem is a problem as well. You just end up with impoverished locals, enriched foreigners, and a country "somewhere else" that slowly dies by being the painting of Dorian Gray for our own environmental sins.
I agree that some elements of the current environmental movement seems more interested in micromanaging your life than doing anything meaningful for the environment, but there's a lot of elements of it which are totally reasonable and good.
If we let some people get their way, the entire continent would look more polluted than Beijing. There was an image posted a while back of a slaughterhouse that turned the river it was next to into a nightmare of fat and entrails and rejected animal carcasses, and it wasn't until someone with the power stepped in to do so and forced them to stop it that the river was recovered for the public's use. That sort of abuse is a liberty issue as well. If companies can just destroy our shared environment and at the end of it just go out of business that's a problem.
This is one of those cases where a balance needs to be found between the rights of the people as a whole to the enjoyment of the waterway in a pristine form and the rights of the individual trying to enjoy their own property by running a factory of some sort. I don't think the question should be "environmentalism: yes or no?", but a more nuanced "where is the line that best balances the rights of the people and the rights of individual property owners?"
And on a completely different tangent, the fact that they lock down our factories but allow products built in factories that are more than happy to destroy the global ecosystem is a problem as well. You just end up with impoverished locals, enriched foreigners, and a country "somewhere else" that slowly dies by being the painting of Dorian Gray for our own environmental sins.
Probably nearly 100% efficient, but not necessarily cost effective, assuming those radiators are being heated with natural gas. Burning a thing to make water hot is pretty hard to improve upon by throwing a generator and a bunch of power lines in between the fire and the thing we want to make hot.
I think there's a place for non-competes, but it's the sort of thing where a heavy consideration needs to be in place. As in, it's the sort of thing you'd do for senior management, and in exchange for being out of the market that senior management gets a considerable amount of money at the time of termination commensurate with what's being asked of them. I believe that jurisprudence on the topic in Canada is similar to that.
We've seen that if there isn't a heavy cost for asking an employee to take such a heavy burden, you very quickly start to see absurdity like fast food employees having to sign non-competes.
On the whole, I perceive that specific regulation or deregulation is irrelevant when all the other regulation becomes all-encompassing enough. Putting one small factor or another on the table or taking it off isn't that important when facing a system specifically designed to ensure overwhelmingly large organizations get a lion's share of everything.
That being said, I think we've been living in the current paradigm so long that I don't know what an alternative that puts more power in the hands of individual workers and less in the hands of employers who are selected from the pool as companies that are large enough to deal with the bureaucracy of hiring someone looks like.
We've seen that if there isn't a heavy cost for asking an employee to take such a heavy burden, you very quickly start to see absurdity like fast food employees having to sign non-competes.
On the whole, I perceive that specific regulation or deregulation is irrelevant when all the other regulation becomes all-encompassing enough. Putting one small factor or another on the table or taking it off isn't that important when facing a system specifically designed to ensure overwhelmingly large organizations get a lion's share of everything.
That being said, I think we've been living in the current paradigm so long that I don't know what an alternative that puts more power in the hands of individual workers and less in the hands of employers who are selected from the pool as companies that are large enough to deal with the bureaucracy of hiring someone looks like.
I never made any threats to you or anyone.
All that happened was I slightly challenged a point when you disagreed with me when I was mostly agreeing with you.
Then you started throwing around threats. I still haven't threatened you or anyone, and I don't intend to. I just think you're a jerk.
All that happened was I slightly challenged a point when you disagreed with me when I was mostly agreeing with you.
Then you started throwing around threats. I still haven't threatened you or anyone, and I don't intend to. I just think you're a jerk.
Ah, you're one of *those* people.
Nevermind, I'll just go over with the people who don't start with threats when faced with mild agreement.
Nevermind, I'll just go over with the people who don't start with threats when faced with mild agreement.
Oh, so Walmart doesn't pay people less because they can encourage people to go on welfare? That didn't happen? Was it disinformation?
What you subsidize, you get more of. Subsidize being homeless and you'll get more homeless because it's a viable option.
Not to mention, eventually the programs that are intended for the bottom of society climb up. Instead of moving away from Southern ontario, one of the most expensive places to live in the world, we will have a bunch of people working for Walmart and collecting government homeless assistance. Since we know that Walmart does stuff like this.
Not to mention, eventually the programs that are intended for the bottom of society climb up. Instead of moving away from Southern ontario, one of the most expensive places to live in the world, we will have a bunch of people working for Walmart and collecting government homeless assistance. Since we know that Walmart does stuff like this.
Thanks for the suggestion. You're right, it's on another level compared to the other modern classical music I was recommended.
I won't forget.
And a bunch of people who really know fucking better, including bunch of people that I normally have a lot of respect for, fell for a line hook and sinker.
Well you know what, I'll remember that the next time that the mainstream media is lying about you. Exactly how you responded when the mainstream media was lying about us.
And a bunch of people who really know fucking better, including bunch of people that I normally have a lot of respect for, fell for a line hook and sinker.
Well you know what, I'll remember that the next time that the mainstream media is lying about you. Exactly how you responded when the mainstream media was lying about us.
European classical music through the eras Content Warning: Effortposting
I've been working to get a better understanding of history and culture to prepare myself for teaching my son on many topics. One of the exercises we do every week is to listen to music other than pop music. To do this properly, I've been really diving deep, not just in Europe, but around the world. Today, I've been digging into the history of European music, specifically classical music.
The period before 500 CE is commonly referred to as "Antiquity." This period covers a broad range of time, from the earliest civilizations in Mesopotamia and Egypt to the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE. During this time, ancient civilizations such as the Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians developed their own unique styles of music, art, and architecture, which had a lasting influence on the development of Western art and culture. During Antiquity in Northern Europe, music was an important part of religious and cultural practices among various tribes and civilizations. However, limited historical records and musical artifacts from this time have made it difficult to determine the specific musical styles and practices that were prevalent in Northern Europe during Antiquity.
I've listened to some examples of music from antiquity such as the hymn to apollo, and it seems like they did have somewhat complicated polyphonic music, so just because it seems like there's a straight line ahead from monophonic music doesn't mean that this is where music started.
Here's a rundown of different periods post-antiquity, centered around major musical movements.
Medieval Music (c. 500-1400): During the medieval period, Western Europe was dominated by the Roman Catholic Church, which had a significant impact on the development of music. The Church's preference for plainchant, or monophonic music, was due to the religious and liturgical nature of the music. It was believed that the single melody of plainchant was better suited for expressing devotional and contemplative texts. Additionally, the lack of musical notation during this period made it difficult to preserve and perform complex polyphonic music. An example of this period is "Gregorian Chant" by various composers. Notable art for the period included Gothic architecture, such as Notre-Dame de Paris, Chartres Cathedral, and Salisbury Cathedral. Notable historical and geopolitical events of the era are the fall of the Western Roman Empire (476 CE), and the rise of the Catholic Church as a major cultural and political force.
During the Medieval Era, music was primarily religious in nature and was commissioned by the Church. Monks and priests were the main composers and performers of this music, and it was performed in monasteries, cathedrals, and churches. Music was used as part of religious rituals, such as the Mass and other liturgical celebrations, and was often performed by choirs and vocal ensembles. Music was also used for entertainment purposes and was performed at royal courts and festivals.
Listening to some examples of this music, it's really just a monophonic straight line of notes. If you never heard other music I can see it being beautiful, but lonely.
Renaissance Music (c. 1400-1600): The Renaissance was a time of great cultural and artistic revival in Europe, and music was no exception. The invention of musical notation and the development of printing made it possible to preserve and distribute music more widely. Polyphonic music, which had been practiced in the courts of noble families and among the Catholic clergy, became more widespread during this period. The humanist movement of the Renaissance also placed a greater emphasis on individual expression and creativity, which influenced composers to experiment with new forms and styles. An example of this period is "Missa Papae Marcelli" by Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina. Notable art for the period included paintings by artists such as Leonardo da Vinci (The Last Supper, Mona Lisa), Michelangelo (David, Sistine Chapel Ceiling), and Raphael (The School of Athens, Sistine Madonna). Notable historical and geopolitical events of the era are the discovery of the New World (1492), and the Protestant Reformation (1517).
The Renaissance was a period of great cultural and artistic flourishing, and music was no exception. During this time, music became more secular in nature and was commissioned by royalty, wealthy patrons, and the Church. Composers, such as Giovanni da Palestrina and Claudio Monteverdi, wrote music for both religious and secular purposes, and their works were performed in courts, cathedrals, and other venues. Music was also spread through the printing of sheet music, making it more accessible to a wider audience.
Listening to the music of the Renaissance is really beautiful, polyphonic, playing with harmonies in fantastic ways. Misa Papae Marcelli sounds like an expansion of the gregorian chants.
Baroque Music (c. 1600-1750): During the Baroque period, music became more ornate and elaborate, reflecting the opulent and grandiose style of the courts of Europe. The rise of the middle class and the growth of cities also created new opportunities for musicians and composers, who were often employed by churches, courts, and other institutions. The Baroque period is known for its use of complex musical forms, such as the concerto and the opera, and for its use of large orchestral ensembles. An example of this period is "Brandenburg Concertos" by Johann Sebastian Bach. Notable art for the period included Paintings by artists such as Caravaggio (The Calling of St. Matthew, The Conversion of Saint Paul), Rubens (The Elevation of the Cross, The Descent from the Cross), and Rembrandt (The Night Watch, Self-Portrait with Two Circles). Notable historical and geopolitical events of the era are the Thirty Years' War, and the scientific revolution and the works of scientists like Galileo and Newton.
The Baroque Era saw the development of elaborate musical forms, such as the opera, the concerto, and the sonata. Music was commissioned by royalty and wealthy patrons, and was performed in courts, churches, and opera houses. The Baroque era also saw the rise of professional musicians and composers, such as Johann Sebastian Bach and George Frideric Handel, who wrote music for public performances and private concerts. Music was also spread through published sheet music, music journals, and the widespread use of instruments such as the harpsichord and violin.
Listening to this music really invokes the feeling of "classical music" in the way I'd think of it normally. It's complex compared to the simple polyphonics of the renaissance era, but it's a sort of naive complexity. Straightforward in its complexity if that makes any sense.
Classical Music (c. 1730-1820): The classical period was characterized by a focus on clarity, balance, and elegance in musical expression. The music of this period was inspired by the ideals of the Enlightenment, which emphasized reason and rationality. The symphony and sonata became the dominant forms of classical music, and composers such as Mozart and Beethoven made significant contributions to these forms. The growth of public concerts and the development of music publishing also made classical music more accessible to a wider audience during this period. An example of this era is "Symphony No. 40 in G minor" by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, or "Moonlight Sonata" by Ludwig van Beethoven. Notable art for the period included sculptures by artists such as Antonio Canova (Psyche Revived by Cupid's Kiss, Pauline Bonaparte as Venus Victrix), Jacques-Louis David (The Death of Marat, The Oath of the Horatii), and Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres (Napoleon I on his Imperial Throne, The Turkish Bath). Notable historical and geopolitical events of the era are the American Revolution, and the French Revolution.
The Classical Era was a time of great musical innovation and experimentation, and was marked by the works of composers such as Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Ludwig van Beethoven, and Franz Joseph Haydn. Music was commissioned by royalty, wealthy patrons, and the middle class, and was performed in opera houses, concert halls, and private homes. The rise of public concerts and music festivals also helped to spread music to a wider audience.
Listening to this music, you can really hear the multiple layers of complexity that interplay in interesting ways.
Romantic Music (c. 1815-1910): Romantic music was characterized by its emotional intensity and its focus on individual expression. The Romantic movement was a reaction against the Enlightenment and its focus on reason and rationality. Composers of this period sought to express their own personal feelings and emotions in their music, and they often used music to evoke a sense of mystery, wonder, and awe. The use of larger orchestras and sweeping melodies became more common during this period, as did the use of musical forms such as the symphonic poem. An example of this era is "Nocturne in E-flat major" by Frédéric Chopin, or "Symphony No. 5" by Ludwig van Beethoven. Notable art for the period included paintings by artists such as Caspar David Friedrich (Wanderer Above the Sea of Fog, Monk by the Sea), Eugene Delacroix (Liberty Leading the People, The Death of Sardanapalus), and J.M.W. Turner (The Fighting Temeraire, The Burning of the Houses of Lords and Commons). Notable historical and geopolitical events of the era are the Industrial Revolution, and the growth of nationalism and the rise of nation-states in Europe.
The Romantic Era was a time of great emotional expression in music, and was characterized by the works of composers such as Frédéric Chopin, Ludwig van Beethoven, and Richard Wagner. Music was commissioned by wealthy patrons and was performed in concert halls and opera houses. The rise of the middle class and the expansion of public education also helped to spread music to a wider audience.
Listening to this eras music, I can really hear it, that it isn't necessarily massively more complex than the classical era, but I find the works I listened to were much more in your face evocative.
Modern Classical Music (c. 1900-present): Modern classical music encompasses a wide range of styles and genres that developed during the 20th and 21st centuries. The rejection of traditional musical forms and the experimentation with new techniques and structures were hallmarks of this period. The rise of serialism, minimalism, and aleatoric music reflected the cultural and intellectual movements of the time, including the rejection of traditional values and the embrace of new technologies. An example of this is "Pierrot Lunaire" by Arnold Schoenberg, or "Music for 18 Musicians" by Steve Reich, or "4'33"" by John Cage. Notable art for the period included paintings by artists such as Pablo Picasso (Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, Guernica), Georges Braque (The Portuguese, Violin and Palette), and Salvador Dali (The Persistence of Memory, The Temptation of Saint Anthony). Notable historical and geopolitical events of the era are World War I and World War II, the rise of popular music, the advent of electronic and digital technology, and the globalization of culture.
The Modern Era of classical music has seen the development of new musical styles and forms, as well as the continuation of traditional classical music. Music is commissioned by a variety of organizations, including orchestras, opera companies, and music festivals, and is performed in concert halls, opera houses, and other venues. The widespread availability of recorded music and the internet has also made it easier for people to access and enjoy classical music.
I hate to say it, but the examples of modern classical music really seemed terrible. It's like we took these eras of music and threw away everything about music because we were mad there was a couple bad wars. I hope I just was unlucky.
The period before 500 CE is commonly referred to as "Antiquity." This period covers a broad range of time, from the earliest civilizations in Mesopotamia and Egypt to the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE. During this time, ancient civilizations such as the Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians developed their own unique styles of music, art, and architecture, which had a lasting influence on the development of Western art and culture. During Antiquity in Northern Europe, music was an important part of religious and cultural practices among various tribes and civilizations. However, limited historical records and musical artifacts from this time have made it difficult to determine the specific musical styles and practices that were prevalent in Northern Europe during Antiquity.
I've listened to some examples of music from antiquity such as the hymn to apollo, and it seems like they did have somewhat complicated polyphonic music, so just because it seems like there's a straight line ahead from monophonic music doesn't mean that this is where music started.
Here's a rundown of different periods post-antiquity, centered around major musical movements.
Medieval Music (c. 500-1400): During the medieval period, Western Europe was dominated by the Roman Catholic Church, which had a significant impact on the development of music. The Church's preference for plainchant, or monophonic music, was due to the religious and liturgical nature of the music. It was believed that the single melody of plainchant was better suited for expressing devotional and contemplative texts. Additionally, the lack of musical notation during this period made it difficult to preserve and perform complex polyphonic music. An example of this period is "Gregorian Chant" by various composers. Notable art for the period included Gothic architecture, such as Notre-Dame de Paris, Chartres Cathedral, and Salisbury Cathedral. Notable historical and geopolitical events of the era are the fall of the Western Roman Empire (476 CE), and the rise of the Catholic Church as a major cultural and political force.
During the Medieval Era, music was primarily religious in nature and was commissioned by the Church. Monks and priests were the main composers and performers of this music, and it was performed in monasteries, cathedrals, and churches. Music was used as part of religious rituals, such as the Mass and other liturgical celebrations, and was often performed by choirs and vocal ensembles. Music was also used for entertainment purposes and was performed at royal courts and festivals.
Listening to some examples of this music, it's really just a monophonic straight line of notes. If you never heard other music I can see it being beautiful, but lonely.
Renaissance Music (c. 1400-1600): The Renaissance was a time of great cultural and artistic revival in Europe, and music was no exception. The invention of musical notation and the development of printing made it possible to preserve and distribute music more widely. Polyphonic music, which had been practiced in the courts of noble families and among the Catholic clergy, became more widespread during this period. The humanist movement of the Renaissance also placed a greater emphasis on individual expression and creativity, which influenced composers to experiment with new forms and styles. An example of this period is "Missa Papae Marcelli" by Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina. Notable art for the period included paintings by artists such as Leonardo da Vinci (The Last Supper, Mona Lisa), Michelangelo (David, Sistine Chapel Ceiling), and Raphael (The School of Athens, Sistine Madonna). Notable historical and geopolitical events of the era are the discovery of the New World (1492), and the Protestant Reformation (1517).
The Renaissance was a period of great cultural and artistic flourishing, and music was no exception. During this time, music became more secular in nature and was commissioned by royalty, wealthy patrons, and the Church. Composers, such as Giovanni da Palestrina and Claudio Monteverdi, wrote music for both religious and secular purposes, and their works were performed in courts, cathedrals, and other venues. Music was also spread through the printing of sheet music, making it more accessible to a wider audience.
Listening to the music of the Renaissance is really beautiful, polyphonic, playing with harmonies in fantastic ways. Misa Papae Marcelli sounds like an expansion of the gregorian chants.
Baroque Music (c. 1600-1750): During the Baroque period, music became more ornate and elaborate, reflecting the opulent and grandiose style of the courts of Europe. The rise of the middle class and the growth of cities also created new opportunities for musicians and composers, who were often employed by churches, courts, and other institutions. The Baroque period is known for its use of complex musical forms, such as the concerto and the opera, and for its use of large orchestral ensembles. An example of this period is "Brandenburg Concertos" by Johann Sebastian Bach. Notable art for the period included Paintings by artists such as Caravaggio (The Calling of St. Matthew, The Conversion of Saint Paul), Rubens (The Elevation of the Cross, The Descent from the Cross), and Rembrandt (The Night Watch, Self-Portrait with Two Circles). Notable historical and geopolitical events of the era are the Thirty Years' War, and the scientific revolution and the works of scientists like Galileo and Newton.
The Baroque Era saw the development of elaborate musical forms, such as the opera, the concerto, and the sonata. Music was commissioned by royalty and wealthy patrons, and was performed in courts, churches, and opera houses. The Baroque era also saw the rise of professional musicians and composers, such as Johann Sebastian Bach and George Frideric Handel, who wrote music for public performances and private concerts. Music was also spread through published sheet music, music journals, and the widespread use of instruments such as the harpsichord and violin.
Listening to this music really invokes the feeling of "classical music" in the way I'd think of it normally. It's complex compared to the simple polyphonics of the renaissance era, but it's a sort of naive complexity. Straightforward in its complexity if that makes any sense.
Classical Music (c. 1730-1820): The classical period was characterized by a focus on clarity, balance, and elegance in musical expression. The music of this period was inspired by the ideals of the Enlightenment, which emphasized reason and rationality. The symphony and sonata became the dominant forms of classical music, and composers such as Mozart and Beethoven made significant contributions to these forms. The growth of public concerts and the development of music publishing also made classical music more accessible to a wider audience during this period. An example of this era is "Symphony No. 40 in G minor" by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, or "Moonlight Sonata" by Ludwig van Beethoven. Notable art for the period included sculptures by artists such as Antonio Canova (Psyche Revived by Cupid's Kiss, Pauline Bonaparte as Venus Victrix), Jacques-Louis David (The Death of Marat, The Oath of the Horatii), and Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres (Napoleon I on his Imperial Throne, The Turkish Bath). Notable historical and geopolitical events of the era are the American Revolution, and the French Revolution.
The Classical Era was a time of great musical innovation and experimentation, and was marked by the works of composers such as Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Ludwig van Beethoven, and Franz Joseph Haydn. Music was commissioned by royalty, wealthy patrons, and the middle class, and was performed in opera houses, concert halls, and private homes. The rise of public concerts and music festivals also helped to spread music to a wider audience.
Listening to this music, you can really hear the multiple layers of complexity that interplay in interesting ways.
Romantic Music (c. 1815-1910): Romantic music was characterized by its emotional intensity and its focus on individual expression. The Romantic movement was a reaction against the Enlightenment and its focus on reason and rationality. Composers of this period sought to express their own personal feelings and emotions in their music, and they often used music to evoke a sense of mystery, wonder, and awe. The use of larger orchestras and sweeping melodies became more common during this period, as did the use of musical forms such as the symphonic poem. An example of this era is "Nocturne in E-flat major" by Frédéric Chopin, or "Symphony No. 5" by Ludwig van Beethoven. Notable art for the period included paintings by artists such as Caspar David Friedrich (Wanderer Above the Sea of Fog, Monk by the Sea), Eugene Delacroix (Liberty Leading the People, The Death of Sardanapalus), and J.M.W. Turner (The Fighting Temeraire, The Burning of the Houses of Lords and Commons). Notable historical and geopolitical events of the era are the Industrial Revolution, and the growth of nationalism and the rise of nation-states in Europe.
The Romantic Era was a time of great emotional expression in music, and was characterized by the works of composers such as Frédéric Chopin, Ludwig van Beethoven, and Richard Wagner. Music was commissioned by wealthy patrons and was performed in concert halls and opera houses. The rise of the middle class and the expansion of public education also helped to spread music to a wider audience.
Listening to this eras music, I can really hear it, that it isn't necessarily massively more complex than the classical era, but I find the works I listened to were much more in your face evocative.
Modern Classical Music (c. 1900-present): Modern classical music encompasses a wide range of styles and genres that developed during the 20th and 21st centuries. The rejection of traditional musical forms and the experimentation with new techniques and structures were hallmarks of this period. The rise of serialism, minimalism, and aleatoric music reflected the cultural and intellectual movements of the time, including the rejection of traditional values and the embrace of new technologies. An example of this is "Pierrot Lunaire" by Arnold Schoenberg, or "Music for 18 Musicians" by Steve Reich, or "4'33"" by John Cage. Notable art for the period included paintings by artists such as Pablo Picasso (Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, Guernica), Georges Braque (The Portuguese, Violin and Palette), and Salvador Dali (The Persistence of Memory, The Temptation of Saint Anthony). Notable historical and geopolitical events of the era are World War I and World War II, the rise of popular music, the advent of electronic and digital technology, and the globalization of culture.
The Modern Era of classical music has seen the development of new musical styles and forms, as well as the continuation of traditional classical music. Music is commissioned by a variety of organizations, including orchestras, opera companies, and music festivals, and is performed in concert halls, opera houses, and other venues. The widespread availability of recorded music and the internet has also made it easier for people to access and enjoy classical music.
I hate to say it, but the examples of modern classical music really seemed terrible. It's like we took these eras of music and threw away everything about music because we were mad there was a couple bad wars. I hope I just was unlucky.
No, it's just a joke that doesn't translate well.
For the context of this joke, you can see the following video. Imagine the earnest announcer declaring his future cowardice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdpLWML_tDU
For the context of this joke, you can see the following video. Imagine the earnest announcer declaring his future cowardice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdpLWML_tDU
Thanks! I haven't gotten it, but this helped me with a big 75% I never would have known on my own. I'll keep chipping away.
I guess emergency broadcast system messages don't really translate.
I needed a message in another language to test translation. (no luck yet)
I needed a message in another language to test translation. (no luck yet)
Il s'agit d'un test du système de diffusion d'urgence. Si cela avait été plus qu'un test, je ne serais pas là. Je fuirais dans une terreur absolue en espérant contre tout espoir que les autoroutes vers nulle part ne soient pas trop encombrées.
Ceci est seulement un test.
Ceci est seulement un test.