The FBI may also be sitting on the Nashville shooter's manifesto because it holds the secret map to get to the fabled el Dorado the city of gold.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLglTodSj6fQGbLTtPF_YXVJ6TKSaC3O02
Relevant playlist (oh no I've ruined someone's entire day because they'll watch 5 hours of half life improv)
Relevant playlist (oh no I've ruined someone's entire day because they'll watch 5 hours of half life improv)
A lot is said about fatherlessness and it's effects, which includes increased aggression and propensity for crime in boys and much earlier puberty and higher rates of sexual promiscuity in girls, but I just had an aha moment as to why.
When a child has no father, that could indicate a distressed environment. In such an environment, it makes sense that boys who take more risks would be more successful, and girls who procreate earlier and less discriminately would be more successful, so humans who evolve with traits that would activate those behaviors in children who lack a father. This suggests that we're prewired by evolution to act this way because it's a net positive for the bloodline so families that behave this way are selected for but only when times are tough meaning there's a sort of modality in when to engage the strategy.
Just because they're successful survival strategies doesn't mean they're good ways to live, mind you. It also doesn't mean such people are biologically determined to lead bad lives.
Now, is it part of epigenetics? Is it a neurological thing? I am not in any position to even speculate.
When a child has no father, that could indicate a distressed environment. In such an environment, it makes sense that boys who take more risks would be more successful, and girls who procreate earlier and less discriminately would be more successful, so humans who evolve with traits that would activate those behaviors in children who lack a father. This suggests that we're prewired by evolution to act this way because it's a net positive for the bloodline so families that behave this way are selected for but only when times are tough meaning there's a sort of modality in when to engage the strategy.
Just because they're successful survival strategies doesn't mean they're good ways to live, mind you. It also doesn't mean such people are biologically determined to lead bad lives.
Now, is it part of epigenetics? Is it a neurological thing? I am not in any position to even speculate.
Literally everything is an immediate mortal threat to these people.
Someone needs to tell them the story of the boy who cried wolf.
Someone needs to tell them the story of the boy who cried wolf.
I think a lot of those white collar jobs were already on the chopping block before AI. There's a huge oversupply of such people which is one of the reasons for some of the bigger problems in the world as these people who know they don't actually do anything for their disproportionately good living try to justify their existence to themselves and to the companies they work for. It's like a dog chewing up the furniture because you never take it for a walk, but for middle management.
People lose their jobs to new tools all the time. It could be as simple as a conveyor belt being installed in a plant so the person who previously carried a thing from point A to point B loses their job.
It's a bad day for the people who lose their jobs, but it doesn't mean a conveyor belt isn't just another tool either.
It's a bad day for the people who lose their jobs, but it doesn't mean a conveyor belt isn't just another tool either.
The deep state doesn't want them to know this, but checkmarks on the fediverse are free.
I've seen the future, and it's interconnected and decentralized. The idea that we'd make the same mistake again and give all the power to one website we don't control and the stock market does seems crazy -- we've already seen how that movie ends.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QENcgkXAPeA
Worth the 10 minutes. Way more harrowing than you'd think for a bunch of microbes.
Worth the 10 minutes. Way more harrowing than you'd think for a bunch of microbes.
The blue bits are possibly archaea. Not much to look at at 400x, but cool to know they're there.
To be fair, the whitest guy you know is only white, and not orange.
Whether it's bad or not really depends on the skin color, as we know.
Whether it's bad or not really depends on the skin color, as we know.
"Oh no! His immune system is black!"
"It's cancer! Shoot! Shoot!"
>and that's when we decided profiling the immune system wasn't a good idea.
"It's cancer! Shoot! Shoot!"
>and that's when we decided profiling the immune system wasn't a good idea.
I remember at the time they were trying to change the fact that most cars looked exactly the same so this pos car was supposed to invoke old cars for boomers (or maybe their retired parents?)