In an effort to "avoid a bud light situation" Target brings a bud light situation upon itself.
@BowsacNoodle @Godcast They have the potential to be, and that’s bad enough.
Collapse now and avoid the rush.
Also, my kids are much happier and more well rounded in homeschool. Of course they have no screens, no phones, we don’t own a computer or TV, which also helps more than you’d think.
Collapse now and avoid the rush.
Also, my kids are much happier and more well rounded in homeschool. Of course they have no screens, no phones, we don’t own a computer or TV, which also helps more than you’d think.
'You're keeping our life savings hostage!' Apple customers struggle to access their cash - one month after the tech giant launched its competitive savings account with Goldman Sachs…
@GeraldKutney @teknomunk Source? Source? Source?
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
You dont understand companies "going woke" if you dont understand ESG funding and this 👇
