FBXL Social

🌲-alist | @threalist@social.fbxl.net

> figured out which one is for training and which one is to actually let you in

Excuse me what?

Literally the whole process of science is to not trust the science.

Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.

When someone says, “Science teaches such and such,” he is using the word incorrectly. Science doesn’t teach anything; experience teaches it. If they say to you, “Science has shown such and such,” you might ask, “How does science show it? How did the scientists find out? How? What? Where?”

It should not be “science has shown” but “this experiment, this effect, has shown.” And you have as much right as anyone else, upon hearing about the experiments–but be patient and listen to all the evidence–to judge whether a sensible conclusion has been arrived at.

– Richard Feynman

I mean, if we judge it by how many women fell for it, it has been a resounding success.

> the claimed effect is twice as likely to be false as it is to be true

Incredible.

The science truly says "Don't trust the science."

â…” of peer reviewed published scientific papers fail replication. That means whenever you read a "new study finds" headline, the claimed effect is twice as likely to be false as it is to be true. The effect is smaller in 'hard' sciences and most pronounced in psychology and public health fields.

They despise you..


https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4697516-nih-record-scandal-gop-attacks-fauci/

a former Fauci aide and career NIH scientist, testified last week that he may have sent information on government business to Fauci’s personal email address.

“I can either send stuff to Tony on his private gmail, or hand it to him at work … He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble,” Morens wrote in a 2021 email released by the committee.

“i learned from our [FOIA] lady here how to make emails disappear after i am foia’d but before the search starts, so i think we are all safe,” Morens wrote in a separate email. “Plus i deleted most of those earlier emails after sending them to gmail.”

"New study finds.."

Is there an element of self sabotage to this?

Does he know subconsciously he isn't as good as what's-his-name who played the character first, so he's creating drama because it would be easier to tell yourself that the drama you created is why you aren't as popular, rather than facing that you simply aren't as popular as the last guy..

AI chatbots unable to accurately summarise news, BBC finds - The BBC's head of news and current affairs says the developers of the tools are "playing ... - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0m17d8827ko

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the difference between "legal" and "justice"

Not according to Apple

Um Based or not?

»