FBXL Social

🌲-alist | @threalist@social.fbxl.net

Problem is that a majority of Republicans belong to the same club..

😳

🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂

@YoungBlood

That is good news! Im wondering if they'll ever face any real consequences rather than just firing them and allowing them to walk away free. She knew exactly what she was doing! 59 million dollars could have went a long ways in helping hurricane victims.

@NitroDubs @LouisConde It's mostly just some zoomer mumbling in auto-tune a barely coherent rambling session while claiming they're 'the best to ever do it'. Only to vanish into obscurity/irrelevance after like a week.

And then later get shot to death in some meaningless altercation at a strip club.

Yes, our government was essentially an organized crime syndicate, but that’s not the worst part!

What’s worse is they weren’t even doing it for our benefit!

Worse than that?

It’s essentially an unsolvable problem. Maybe it gets cleaned up some, maybe it’s worst abuses are curtailed, but for how long?

Congratulations you are now in the same line of thinking that lead eventually to our constitution. Jefferson would be proud.

I'm glad to see the general public has caught up to my position for the past 30 years that rap "music" is shitty and gay.

> a lot of people will stop creating, painting, writing poetry when the AI can do it so much better

Yeah, that's interesting.

But at the same time, as AI is normalized, there will be an increased interest in human generated content.

Argentina is an infinite socialist onion and no matter how many layers you peel, there’s always another one underneath. 🧅

@wjmaggos >government gone rogue
Is this "rogue government" more or less likely to abduct kids to have them castrated against their parent's desires? 🤔

UK Deputy PM Angela Rayner Plans Government-Backed Islamophobia Council, Despite Free Speech Concerns

https://reclaimthenet.org/uk-islamophobia-council-angela-rayner-dominic-grieve-free-speech-concerns?utm_source=fediverse

@nierenstein

I assumed that captcha was being used to train image models.

I didn't realize you could feed it incorrect information.

I figured they were smarter than this, and assumed that some of the answers were true/false and those that were not they would take a confidence level of 9/10 people saying it was a "fire hydrant" would then be used to feed back into the model.

Those image based captchas where you have to click squares where objects are and you get two in a row, one of them is an actual captcha that lets you into the site and the other is them using you to train their AIs — they use what you click to identify objects their systems can’t

> figured out which one is for training and which one is to actually let you in

Excuse me what?

Literally the whole process of science is to not trust the science.

Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.

When someone says, “Science teaches such and such,” he is using the word incorrectly. Science doesn’t teach anything; experience teaches it. If they say to you, “Science has shown such and such,” you might ask, “How does science show it? How did the scientists find out? How? What? Where?”

It should not be “science has shown” but “this experiment, this effect, has shown.” And you have as much right as anyone else, upon hearing about the experiments–but be patient and listen to all the evidence–to judge whether a sensible conclusion has been arrived at.

– Richard Feynman

I mean, if we judge it by how many women fell for it, it has been a resounding success.

»