Part of the problem is that people cannot fathom the amount of fraud and waste being uncovered by unelected bureaucrats right now.
The average person has a pretty good handle on $100,000 because they can relate it to salaries or home values for example. Even a million starts to get hard to understand.
But the levels of fraud and kickbacks are literally incomprehensible for many people so the gravity of the situation is not fully understood.
The average person has a pretty good handle on $100,000 because they can relate it to salaries or home values for example. Even a million starts to get hard to understand.
But the levels of fraud and kickbacks are literally incomprehensible for many people so the gravity of the situation is not fully understood.

We all know where the money went..
> Ukrainian officials exposed on alleged corruption, nearly $6 million found
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/ukrainian-officials-exposed-on-alleged-corruption-nearly-6-million-found/ar-AA1rHSoZ
> Ukrainian officials exposed on alleged corruption, nearly $6 million found
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/ukrainian-officials-exposed-on-alleged-corruption-nearly-6-million-found/ar-AA1rHSoZ

1. Provide for the common defense
2. Manage interstate relations
3. Unified platform of individual rights
4. Ownership of international relations
5. Ensure State rights on all other matters
Did I miss anything?
2. Manage interstate relations
3. Unified platform of individual rights
4. Ownership of international relations
5. Ensure State rights on all other matters
Did I miss anything?
Curious.
> Iโd tried to leave my neurotic, anxious personality behind. Then I became a parent, and everything changed.
> Iโd tried to leave my neurotic, anxious personality behind. Then I became a parent, and everything changed.
> surrender their objectivity
Well, no.
A name change is not the same as redefining something against objective reality.
If the government changes the name, then objectively that I the new name. This is not the same as redefining something as something it is not.
It's a naming dispute.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denali%E2%80%93Mount_McKinley_naming_dispute
Well, no.
A name change is not the same as redefining something against objective reality.
If the government changes the name, then objectively that I the new name. This is not the same as redefining something as something it is not.
It's a naming dispute.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denali%E2%80%93Mount_McKinley_naming_dispute
This is like Bob changing his name legally to Chad.
It can, and does happen:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denali%E2%80%93Mount_McKinley_naming_dispute
This is not redefining the thing by changing the name. That would be calling it something other than a gulf, which it is, and demanding that everyone accept that it is now a different geographical feature.
Analogy is wrong. It doesn't work.
It can, and does happen:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denali%E2%80%93Mount_McKinley_naming_dispute
This is not redefining the thing by changing the name. That would be calling it something other than a gulf, which it is, and demanding that everyone accept that it is now a different geographical feature.
Analogy is wrong. It doesn't work.

I agree.
We should continue to tax Americans and pile on massive debt to allow unelected bureaucrats to siphon billions into slush funds, scams, and kickbacks so that we can...
*checks notes*
..help the poor?
We should continue to tax Americans and pile on massive debt to allow unelected bureaucrats to siphon billions into slush funds, scams, and kickbacks so that we can...
*checks notes*
..help the poor?