FBXL Social

@graf @admin I've said before, freedoms must face a balancing test, because freedoms can conflict. If one person's freedom to say something of substance is threatened by another person using their freedom to say nonsense, then it's sensible that you restrict one person's freedom. On the other hand, that's a sliding scale, so from admin to admin and from instance to instance you could decide the point where the right to say nonsense has sufficiently transgressed upon someone else's right to speak substance is in a different spot.

Realistically, with human beings it's going to be squishy and subjective, and there isn't going to be a mathematical equation to figure out the perfect point from a moralistic point of view, but what you've just said sounds like a reasonable practical rule.