@kravietz Unfortunately, the reality that industrial scale energy generation is always going to have some negative effect on the planet isn't understood by most people, so it's relatively easy to manipulate them into hating sustainable energy sources with less impact over decades and centuries. Hydroelectric is my favorite example of this, where it's been producing power for over 100 years in some areas but it's been so demonized nobody wants to touch it.
Unfortunately, a bunch of snake-oil salesmen are trying to sell us the idea of environmentalism instead of providing solutions to the power needs around the world and a bunch of us are buying it because a fantasy of magic boxes that can defy the laws of thermodynamics on a macro scale will always be more attractive than the reality that you're always choosing between a bunch of bad options.
Unfortunately, a bunch of snake-oil salesmen are trying to sell us the idea of environmentalism instead of providing solutions to the power needs around the world and a bunch of us are buying it because a fantasy of magic boxes that can defy the laws of thermodynamics on a macro scale will always be more attractive than the reality that you're always choosing between a bunch of bad options.
@DaveyDelimbo @kravietz the biggest energy consumers in a home aren't computers or iPhones, it's HVAC and appliances. Heating in winter on the coldest days and cooling in summer on the hottest days, and refrigeration for food. Most gadgets put together don't count for 1% of a homes power consumption.
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 1
@kravietz @DaveyDelimbo my understanding is that it's a smart move. You get more heating or cooling energy than you put in because you're borrowing effort from the earth.