All the people talking about Kyle's case setting a precedent literally don't know how precedent works.
Lower courts don't set precedent. Only higher courts do, because lower courts are held to the decisions of higher courts, but nobody is held to a decision made by a lower court judge.
What happened here is the court applied the law correctly, and the jury found the facts correctly. Nothing changes in terms of the broader practice of law.
Lower courts don't set precedent. Only higher courts do, because lower courts are held to the decisions of higher courts, but nobody is held to a decision made by a lower court judge.
What happened here is the court applied the law correctly, and the jury found the facts correctly. Nothing changes in terms of the broader practice of law.
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0