I think that all of it is done as part of a course of action intended to weaponize politics.
The first step is to atomize political ideas so you got all these different ideas and often different elements of the same idea that don't make sense to separate, and even things that could potentially be considered part of the same spectrum are then separated into separate and often opposing ideas, and it's that opposition that leads into the second thing that they do. The second thing is to take those newly atomized political ideas and reintegrate them in ways that don't follow, but are useful.
One of the best examples of this was right after George Floyd was killed, and if you wanted to agree with the proposition that we should probably take a look and make sure black people weren't getting murdered by police, suddenly you also had to agree in transgender ideology the destruction of the atomic family and the abolition of capitalism. Sort of feels like the way cable companies bundle stuff together. This allows unpopular ideas to remora onto popular ones.
It also lets you to the opposite. If you think about it, isn't it odd that somehow they would be able to connect not wanting to take an experimental drug to all the isms? Logically it doesn't remotely follow, yet they were able to clump them together to make it easier to attack a reasonable position by tying it to unreasonable ones...
The first step is to atomize political ideas so you got all these different ideas and often different elements of the same idea that don't make sense to separate, and even things that could potentially be considered part of the same spectrum are then separated into separate and often opposing ideas, and it's that opposition that leads into the second thing that they do. The second thing is to take those newly atomized political ideas and reintegrate them in ways that don't follow, but are useful.
One of the best examples of this was right after George Floyd was killed, and if you wanted to agree with the proposition that we should probably take a look and make sure black people weren't getting murdered by police, suddenly you also had to agree in transgender ideology the destruction of the atomic family and the abolition of capitalism. Sort of feels like the way cable companies bundle stuff together. This allows unpopular ideas to remora onto popular ones.
It also lets you to the opposite. If you think about it, isn't it odd that somehow they would be able to connect not wanting to take an experimental drug to all the isms? Logically it doesn't remotely follow, yet they were able to clump them together to make it easier to attack a reasonable position by tying it to unreasonable ones...
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0