If the press was banned from twitter for doxxing, it's overdue imo.
Twitter made up rules in order to keep the son of a former vice president who was found to be likely selling influence safe, but was strangely silent when my personal details were leaked to the press because I anonymously donated to the trucker convoy.
Had establishment press scum emailing me for days. Twitter was totally ok with that. As was the press.
Twitter made up rules in order to keep the son of a former vice president who was found to be likely selling influence safe, but was strangely silent when my personal details were leaked to the press because I anonymously donated to the trucker convoy.
Had establishment press scum emailing me for days. Twitter was totally ok with that. As was the press.
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 7
- likes
- 6
Well that makes sense. In the revolutionary war we didn't have a global communications Network where one bad actor could expose the private information of someone who wished to stay anonymous to a global audience. The world was a lot more local, so journalism was generally a lot more local. A journalist could potentially dig up the personal information of an individual, but the scale was completely different. They couldn't immediately and basically for free get a whole bunch of personal information that was acquired unlawfully, and if they did, they couldn't instantly broadcast that information for free around the world instantly, and even if they did, it wasn't really a mechanism for somebody on the other side of the planet to basically for free start harassing someone else's contacts such as businesses they work with or work for.
Posted a bunch of thoughts on this here. You'll see it on narwhal.city if you're subbed to freeforum there
https://lotide.fbxl.net/posts/17835
https://lotide.fbxl.net/posts/17835