> Everything was a little bit ambiguousâthey werenât _smart_ enough to understand what was meant by ârigor.â They were faking it. They were teaching something they didnât understand, and which was, in fact, _useless_, at that time, for the child.
đ
đ
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 1
> Everything was written by somebody who didnât know what the hell he was talking about, so it was a little bit wrong, always! And how we are going to teach well by using books written by people who donât _quite_ understand what theyâre talking about, I _cannot_ understand. I donât know why, but the books are lousy; UNIVERSALLY LOUSY!
Now extrapolate this over the entire education system
Now extrapolate this over the entire education system
Ladies and gentleman, I present to you, public education "experts"
> It turned out that the blank book had a rating by some of the other members! They couldnât believe it was blank, because they had a rating. In fact, the rating for the missing book was a little bit higher than for the two others. The fact that there was nothing in the book had nothing to do with the rating.
> It turned out that the blank book had a rating by some of the other members! They couldnât believe it was blank, because they had a rating. In fact, the rating for the missing book was a little bit higher than for the two others. The fact that there was nothing in the book had nothing to do with the rating.
