Hiring, particularly hiring specialists, is tough as hell. You're trying to find someone who doesn't just advertise themselves as able to do the job but is actually able to do the job. Once you hire someone for such a job, you won't even really know that they can do the thing for 3-6 months after they start, and once you've made it that far it becomes really difficult to fire people since you've got to go through the 7 circles of Hell to do so.
So the big question becomes: Sure, resumes are bullshit. What better method is there to determine which people of 7 billion are willing and able to do the job?
So the big question becomes: Sure, resumes are bullshit. What better method is there to determine which people of 7 billion are willing and able to do the job?
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0
I'm not really saying there isn't anything better, I'm sure there are. It's more like administrators are highly conservative so of the tools they are willing to use it's the best they've got. Same as "Nobody got fired for going with IBM/Microsoft"
You're right, the legal framework is also a problem. In some ways, the whole concept of an employee is a gilded cage most people don't even know they're restricted by.
You're right, the legal framework is also a problem. In some ways, the whole concept of an employee is a gilded cage most people don't even know they're restricted by.