Jesus fucking Christ...
That case had nothing to do with the right to strike. It was about the right to sabotage and damage equipment as a bargaining tactic.
The idea that there's someone on the supreme Court that thinks that you should be allowed as a bargaining tactic to use actions that would be illegal in any other situation is horrifying.
And the logic. "Oh, there were violations of labor code so it was justified" -- where'd you get your law degree, a Crackerjack box?
That case had nothing to do with the right to strike. It was about the right to sabotage and damage equipment as a bargaining tactic.
The idea that there's someone on the supreme Court that thinks that you should be allowed as a bargaining tactic to use actions that would be illegal in any other situation is horrifying.
And the logic. "Oh, there were violations of labor code so it was justified" -- where'd you get your law degree, a Crackerjack box?
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0