I mean... I'm against all kinds of killing other people. Don't like wars, MAID is scary because in Canada at least it's changing from a choice to a push, duels arent really a thing, I'm not a fan of murder...
Death penalty too. I'm against killing the world's worst criminals even if I'd like it if some of them were dead because there's a difference between someone being dead and killing them...
I mean, I have a life and a job so it isn't like I actively protest any of these things or abortion, it's just personal opinions I have....
Death penalty too. I'm against killing the world's worst criminals even if I'd like it if some of them were dead because there's a difference between someone being dead and killing them...
I mean, I have a life and a job so it isn't like I actively protest any of these things or abortion, it's just personal opinions I have....
I don't want to kill anyone in self defense if I can help it. I don't own a gun for that purpose (or any purpose, actually)
This may surprise you, but I haven't killed a single person in my entire life. (I know, pretty impressive, you can touch my bicep if you'd like, it's kinda squishy)
Generally it's more effective to stay out of dangerous situations than to be always ready to kill.
Now, you might continue asking questions about different scenarios, and try to back me into a wall where there is no choice but to engage in lethal Force, but as I wrote in the graysonian ethic, "There are often times where your code of conduct is going to conflict internally." And so in real life you "shall always have a situations where the code itself isn't enough and individuals have to use their brain" the trouble with an ideal is that it is ideal and we aren't always going to achieve that ideal. Ideally you would never want to employ any type of violence under any circumstances, but on the other hand ideally you're also going to want to stay safe and sometimes these two ideals are going to be at odds.
This may surprise you, but I haven't killed a single person in my entire life. (I know, pretty impressive, you can touch my bicep if you'd like, it's kinda squishy)
Generally it's more effective to stay out of dangerous situations than to be always ready to kill.
Now, you might continue asking questions about different scenarios, and try to back me into a wall where there is no choice but to engage in lethal Force, but as I wrote in the graysonian ethic, "There are often times where your code of conduct is going to conflict internally." And so in real life you "shall always have a situations where the code itself isn't enough and individuals have to use their brain" the trouble with an ideal is that it is ideal and we aren't always going to achieve that ideal. Ideally you would never want to employ any type of violence under any circumstances, but on the other hand ideally you're also going to want to stay safe and sometimes these two ideals are going to be at odds.
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 1