Not to mention we know full well that there are major problems in the scientific establishment.
I mean it's great that you can cite some p hacked study that was specifically intended to support your point and could not be reproduced independently for any amount of money, put out of establishments that are on the record as giving support to people who agree with you and will go out of their way to destroy anyone who disagrees with you, and put all it goes to show is that you are well entrenched into the establishment.
This appeal to authority fallacy can be really dangerous. You could cite all kinds of University papers in Germany in 1938, did that prove that those policies were correct and we should be acting on their contents?
Although my argument applies to one side of the political spectrum at this moment, my argument is inherently neutral and at different times would apply to both sides of the political spectrum depending on who controls the institutions of that time.
I mean it's great that you can cite some p hacked study that was specifically intended to support your point and could not be reproduced independently for any amount of money, put out of establishments that are on the record as giving support to people who agree with you and will go out of their way to destroy anyone who disagrees with you, and put all it goes to show is that you are well entrenched into the establishment.
This appeal to authority fallacy can be really dangerous. You could cite all kinds of University papers in Germany in 1938, did that prove that those policies were correct and we should be acting on their contents?
Although my argument applies to one side of the political spectrum at this moment, my argument is inherently neutral and at different times would apply to both sides of the political spectrum depending on who controls the institutions of that time.
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 1