The justices are considering whether to roll back access to mifepristone, whose demand has swelled since the high court eliminated the constitutional right to an abortion.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/abortion-pill-case-puts-supreme-court-back-in-the-hot-seat-dec8edad
There are real issues out there, but your politicians would rather fart around.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/abortion-pill-case-puts-supreme-court-back-in-the-hot-seat-dec8edad
There are real issues out there, but your politicians would rather fart around.
I think an important thing to note about "a constitutional right to an abortion" is that they just happen to treat this one non-enumerated constitutional right as more protected than every enumerated right. They treated abortion as a right more protected than speech, access to firearms, the right to be secure in your persons, or right to due process.
And then it was supposedly based on a right to medical privacy, but that supposed right was insanely narrow. It only came into existence if and only if you wanted to kill a baby, and the moment you were done killing the baby it magically disappears as if it never happened.
And then it was supposedly based on a right to medical privacy, but that supposed right was insanely narrow. It only came into existence if and only if you wanted to kill a baby, and the moment you were done killing the baby it magically disappears as if it never happened.
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 1
@sj_zero
Good points. Abortion is not a right, but one may still have a right to have an abortion.
Ultimately it's a cultural question and the law has never been good at those.
Good points. Abortion is not a right, but one may still have a right to have an abortion.
Ultimately it's a cultural question and the law has never been good at those.