Sort of as an aside, there's a lot of talk about deontological ethics vs. teleological ethics, and the idea that you should only be responsible for actions that have negative consequences, but I think this is a good example where there is an argument to be made that some rules should just be followed and it is morally wrong to break them whether there's a negative outcome this time or not.
Nothing happened, but it definitely could have, and then you can't undo the damage.
Nothing happened, but it definitely could have, and then you can't undo the damage.
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 2