FBXL Social

>The author should literally just die
Maybe you should literally just die, or be less aggressive, your choice.

I think the author's point was that hunter gatherers worked less and enjoyed their work more. Did you actually read the whole thing or did you just get butthurt over the first few paragraphs?

You said "The author should literally just die". I.e. that he deserves to or ought to die.
Did you mean "would" rather than "should"?

Also I hate that idea that you mustn't be offended at something that doesn't happen to you. It was a disgusting thing to say even if you "diDN't mEAn Me PeRsONaLLy".

Thanks for doubling down. Now I know what kind of person you are.

Ought ≠ is, BTW. But I doubt you could understand that.
replies
1
announces
0
likes
0

The kind of person who wants people who have never harmed another to die.

@toiletpaper @djsumdog No it's just the case that if you don't meet your needs, you will die. No ought about it. Purely is. Which was my point.

@toiletpaper @djsumdog Maybe you can say that you ought to satisfy your needs if you want to live in an instrumental sense. But it makes no sense to say that you ought to die if you can’t or don’t satisfy your needs. It’s just that you will (assuming nobody helps you).