edit: nothing positive
- replies
- 3
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0
@sj_zero@social.fbxl.net @mousewaffen@norwoodzero.net
Does having kids really give you a legacy though? Does it really?
Think of the poors. Most of their descendants' bloodlines terminate within 2-3 generations.
Think of how many normies have kids - and their kids are brought up as normies, and don't resemble their parents or grandparents in any unique way.
@sj_zero@social.fbxl.net @mousewaffen@norwoodzero.net
Henry VIII, for all his wives and begetting, had exactly two of his children reign as monarchs: Mary I and Elizabeth I. Both were childless.
The throne of England went to James I after Elizabeth; James I was the son of Mary, Queen of Scots who was the niece of Elizabeth I.
@sj_zero@social.fbxl.net @mousewaffen@norwoodzero.net
Sometimes I wonder if the post-monarchist, republican values of our Founding Fathers were the product of inferior bloodlines.
George Washington had no children of his own; although he married a wealthy widow in his youth, so it may not have been his own lack of virility.
Benjamin Franklin, during his youth, had the insightful idea that by seducing much older women he was practicing a form of birth control. He eventually had one illegitimate son who defected to the British.
Thomas Jefferson was an AAP (zoophile).
Even outside the realm of humans, in pre-human primates, the outcomes of a child are improved measurably if the grandparents remain alive after that child reaches adulthood, and again if the parents reach adulthood.
The reality is, everyone in power wants you to feel disempowered. They want you to think that the future is a black pill that only they can protect you from. The same reality is that the ultimate white pill should be that it is indisputable how powerful and important being a parent is, and by being a parent I don't just mean creating your own spawn, but participating in the raising of your children.