I want this to become a thing
@taylan Is feministwiki.org part of it? If not why don't you get it added?
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0
1) More likely to take off because it's tied to an existing and already popular standard (ActivityPub)
2) Has an actual path to decentralisation (ActivityPub again)
But they should still work with each other IMO. For instance, they could adopt the ZWI format and instances could be added to the Encyclosphere search engines.
@silverpill Also, have you heard of Freenet-Locutus? The creator (who is the founder of the old Freenet, Ian Clarke) wants to create a decentralised Wikipedia on it that uses the technology behind X’s Community Notes.
@Hyolobrika Yes, I've heard of it, but I'm not following the development of this platform.
He should also use ActivityPub. Small experimental networks were necessary in 2000s and maybe even in 2010s, but today, after two decades of experimentation with decentralized applications, we need to focus on actually solving the problem
@Hyolobrika Also: leftypedia.miraheze.org/
@Hyolobrika
> prolewiki.org
Don't cite me on dengoid central
>Social ownership can be through the state [blue link], through a collective [red link] or cooperative [red link], or of equity [red link], in the sense of shares of ownership in businesses.[10]
I take it they are the more statist kind of socialists then lol
@Hyolobrika FEP-ef61 is similar to Nostr and I think it can be implemented in all existing ActivityPub applications. Including Ibis
@Hyolobrika If those people are re-inventing wheels (most of them are), this is just a waste of time. In order to make a difference your network should become as widely used as email while remaining decentralized. And Fediverse can be that network.