@cajax Does anyone say they aren't? In my experience "correlation ≠> causation" is used to imply that you shouldn't just assume causation from correlation. I.e. exactly what it appears to say.
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0
@cajax "imply" in this context means logical implication, I.e. proof, not the everyday meaning of indirectly implying something