> That's why he doesn't deserve anyone's vote.
Isn't the validity of a vote the lynchpin of a Sacred Democracy?
The thing is, we'll never know the extent of fraud (guaranteed every single election has fraud, and stating otherwise is ignorant at best) because it wasn't allowed to be investigated. Worse, it was crushed. Questioning anything continues to get you labeled an "election denier."
Why shouldn't voting machines be ripped to pieces to analyze every inch of the machines and code that runs them?
The problem isn't that he questioned the process. The problem is that any questions or concerns are crushed and silenced with prejudice.
If you want honest elections that is not a healthy situation.
Isn't the validity of a vote the lynchpin of a Sacred Democracy?
The thing is, we'll never know the extent of fraud (guaranteed every single election has fraud, and stating otherwise is ignorant at best) because it wasn't allowed to be investigated. Worse, it was crushed. Questioning anything continues to get you labeled an "election denier."
Why shouldn't voting machines be ripped to pieces to analyze every inch of the machines and code that runs them?
The problem isn't that he questioned the process. The problem is that any questions or concerns are crushed and silenced with prejudice.
If you want honest elections that is not a healthy situation.
They spent a trillion dollars, give or take, in Afghanistan, but putting resources into making sure elections are transparent is so much of a burden it will break the system?
Maybe the system is broken then, but people just don't see it without the transparency..
Maybe the system is broken then, but people just don't see it without the transparency..
Can we talk about the absolute insanity, that a sitting US President raised concerns about election fraud, and rather than putting all the cards on the table, and showing Americans everything was on the level, they shut him down and called him names?
It boggles the mind.
It boggles the mind.
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 1
> if you don't put limits on claims, you're saying anyone can say anything
I can't find the number. Best I found was a fact check website substantiating a claim from Biden that most of Trump's lawsuits were dismissed without trial.
The President.
I can't find the number. Best I found was a fact check website substantiating a claim from Biden that most of Trump's lawsuits were dismissed without trial.
The President.
> why do you think they shouldn't have been?
"Cause he represents half the country" is a good starting point.
Another is that if you don't at least pretend to look into it, it will look like you aren't interested in the validity of the voting process and people will lose faith in the institution.
"Cause he represents half the country" is a good starting point.
Another is that if you don't at least pretend to look into it, it will look like you aren't interested in the validity of the voting process and people will lose faith in the institution.