@toast DNS should be decentralised and permissionless
@toast Shouldn't need anyone's permission to make a human-friendly alias for your server, obviously.
@toast You know, you could have just asked for my use case politely instead of being an asshole about it?
@ignaloidas @toast I love the concept of GNS. It has the right technopolitical architecture (web-of-trust rather than hierarchy).
@toast fedi is a public forum dumbass
@ignaloidas @toast it doesn't have the feudal style social hierarchy of ICANN
@toast If I respect your preferences, will you respect mine?
Because I did not in any way forclose reciprocity and I don't know why you assumed that I did.
Because I did not in any way forclose reciprocity and I don't know why you assumed that I did.
@ignaloidas @toast I know. But users can add anything they want to their portion of the namespace, which is not a second-class citizen but a root zone in it's own right (master zone).
Then again, that's probably possible with DNS as well, but (I imagine) more hackily.
Then again, that's probably possible with DNS as well, but (I imagine) more hackily.
@ignaloidas @toast How easy would it be to get everyone on board with this new system if it didn't have the additional benefits of GNS that you refer to ITT?
@ignaloidas @toast Also, how secure would this decentralised DNS be?
Why hasn't it been done already?
Why hasn't it been done already?
- replies
- 2
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0
@toast Same here. But I think if you feel uncomfortable, you should explain why instead of lashing out. All I did was reply to your post.