@lain Violent or just "I hate X group"? Because that makes a huge difference if you ask me.
@Hyolobrika @lain
She probably denied the Holocaust, said that the Nazis were right, and that there should be an ethnic cleansing.
I think that's like the main three categories of illegal speech in Germany.
If that's a real story and not something the redditor made up then I don't know what to say. Seems extremely stupid in every way, LOL.
She probably denied the Holocaust, said that the Nazis were right, and that there should be an ethnic cleansing.
I think that's like the main three categories of illegal speech in Germany.
If that's a real story and not something the redditor made up then I don't know what to say. Seems extremely stupid in every way, LOL.
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0
@taylan @Hyolobrika none of this would be illegal anyway because it was in private.
@lain @taylan @Hyolobrika if a sieg heils in the forest and nobody's around to hear it, does it gas the jews?
@lain @Hyolobrika
How exactly is "private" defined?
Filming it and sending it to someone could be considered public, no? She "published" it to someone, technically? IANAL
How exactly is "private" defined?
Filming it and sending it to someone could be considered public, no? She "published" it to someone, technically? IANAL
@taylan @Hyolobrika
> "Wer in einer Weise, die geeignet ist, den öffentlichen Frieden zu stören [...]"
If it can't disturb public peace, it's not illegal. A message exchanged between two lovers with the explicit wish for it to remain secret is not that.
> "Wer in einer Weise, die geeignet ist, den öffentlichen Frieden zu stören [...]"
If it can't disturb public peace, it's not illegal. A message exchanged between two lovers with the explicit wish for it to remain secret is not that.
@Hyolobrika @taylan @lain I'd break up with her for opsec failures. My house isn't the US Congress, if I need proof you raped children to keep you in line we might not be a good match