"The data was wrong" is a very convenient euphemism for gaslighting the public.
"What they rarely considered was whether something else might be responsible for the disconnect — whether, for instance, government statistics were fundamentally flawed. What if the numbers supporting the case for broad-based prosperity were themselves misrepresentations? What if, in fact, darker assessments of the economy were more authentically tethered to reality?"What if people had been saying that for a long time....
> government statistics were fundamentally flawed
This premise naively gives them the benefit of the doubt. As if they didn't know they were skewing the numbers for votes.
This premise naively gives them the benefit of the doubt. As if they didn't know they were skewing the numbers for votes.
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0
