I find it a useful tool, but people have already started to point out that dull, soulless, lifeless writing comes out of it. Newer versions of the LLMs don't improve on this, it just gives them a more comprehensive data set.
Ultimately, one of the core problems with AI in general is it's epistemologically conservative. It doesn't know anything it wasn't told, and then what it does is mutate and remix that data into something that has the appearance of something new but is essentially just what has come before. As we rely more on it as a tool, it's a limitation we need to keep in mind because people on the cutting edge of thought or research may find their AIs telling them that what hasn't been discovered or created doesn't exist just because it hasn't yet.
Ultimately, one of the core problems with AI in general is it's epistemologically conservative. It doesn't know anything it wasn't told, and then what it does is mutate and remix that data into something that has the appearance of something new but is essentially just what has come before. As we rely more on it as a tool, it's a limitation we need to keep in mind because people on the cutting edge of thought or research may find their AIs telling them that what hasn't been discovered or created doesn't exist just because it hasn't yet.
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 2