I like what @rudyfraser.com says re getting to choose your "interspersed community" on the larger network, but that's exactly what fedi is. Few servers are largely defederated. Each server mostly only functions as a portal into the larger network where "walking through" provides a "raincoat of moderation". I doubt most will want to have to choose their "bricks" separately ala bluesky. People still complain fedi makes them choose a server. #SocialWeb
https://blog.rudyfraser.com/an-internet-of-many-autonomous-communities/
I'm only aware that bluesky exists and is largely more of the same, with censorship being possible from a centralized group.
What do you mean by "choosing bricks"
- replies
- 2
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0
it's a term he uses in the article. while some parts will probably always remain more centralized in practice, bluesky basically breaks our idea of servers into multiple pieces. where you store your data vs moderation etc. while that's cool, I think it will actually work against more decentralization. most will never go beyond the defaults. while here, i think the concept is basically inherent and simpler once you go beyond mastodon dot social.