I just watched an academic giving a short presentation in which the first slide complained that RFK was allowed to have opinions he didn't like, and on the next slide complained that on Twitter opinions that he liked were being censored.
Find it really funny that there's an implicit demand in the intro that the rich and powerful censor unacceptable ideas, while immediately afterwards complaining that some of the Rich and powerful censored their unacceptable ideas. The one solid meme the left have come up with in the last 20 years is the "leopards eating your face party" -- these people want the leopards to eat faces, they just didn't expect leopards would want to eat their face.
Long before Elon Musk purchased twitter, I warned against being a fascist in The Graysonian Ethic. The argument that I made in that book was specifically that you think that the people who abuse power will only abuse power against your enemies, but it has never ever ever worked that way. The people you think on your side will always turn on you if you give them the power to.
Find it really funny that there's an implicit demand in the intro that the rich and powerful censor unacceptable ideas, while immediately afterwards complaining that some of the Rich and powerful censored their unacceptable ideas. The one solid meme the left have come up with in the last 20 years is the "leopards eating your face party" -- these people want the leopards to eat faces, they just didn't expect leopards would want to eat their face.
Long before Elon Musk purchased twitter, I warned against being a fascist in The Graysonian Ethic. The argument that I made in that book was specifically that you think that the people who abuse power will only abuse power against your enemies, but it has never ever ever worked that way. The people you think on your side will always turn on you if you give them the power to.
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 3
@sj_zero Thing is, to this sort of person, this is not a contradiction. You and I see "if they'll censor one side they'll censor the other so censorship is bad." They see the practical results, which is "you can hear opinions I don't like so we need to censor that" and "you can't hear things I do like so they need to stop censoring that." They don't think about it in terms of principles.