Of course, dominance hierarchies do exist. That's self-evident. That doesn't mean that such a worldview should be exclusive. Great leaders see themselves as servants to their subordinates just as much as their subordinates are servants to them. You want great leaders who are competent and powerful, but you also want great leaders whose mandate doesn't just come from competence, but from service.
This is where things like the girlboss archetype becomes inevitable. If you're a psychopath whose worldview says that power is only about being at the top of the dominance hierarchy, then the only way to show you are competent and powerful is to be the strongest, most cut-throat person who never shows any weakness. The thing is, nobody wants that sort of leader. Traditionally, that person was the villain in fiction, not the hero.
The thing is, it applies to men too, so don't think I'm singling out the girlboss. Even within the past century, consider Spider-Man: The point of his character is explicitly not that Spider-Man is the strongest character, it's that he has great power and therefore must use it responsibly.
The leader isn't ideally just whoever is the strongest this week. Ideally, it is the person who can rule with justice, honor, humility, and with the goal being elevating the group you are in charge of. To forget this fact changes everything for the worse, and it's a great reason why most people feel disconnected from a lot of current media, which is laser focused on who is the strongest or most dominant rather than the most worthy.
- replies
- 2
- announces
- 1
- likes
- 2
@sj_zero Look at the institutions that decide what movies get made, and to a lesser extent, books get published. (Most of the book authors probably have movie rights in mind anyway.)
Those institutions all have psychopathic dominance hierarchies. In general I think technology creates dominance hierarchies. Even when the people who invented the technology did not want to do that, it is hard to prevent.
@mike805 @sj_zero The extreme to which this has become the case probably helps explain what I've read about the end of the "Hollywood star" concept.
People who for example casting in a new IP would automatically get an initial audience because of their "star power." This change also makes it a lot harder to try new IPs, thus the big grossing films are almost always sequels.
We can look at Disney through this lens, Star Wars killing off the male heroes, and, oops, Leia's actress died. I've read recently (see link) Victoria Alonso has a "'Mantle Theory': the belief that audiences didn’t love characters, they loved roles. Replace Steve Rogers with anyone and the fans would follow."
See second link celebrating a claimed great success of this as of mid-2021:
"Marvel Exec Reveals Secret To MCU's Success
"Marvel Studios Executive Victoria Alonso talked about Marvel Studios' continued success and the key role diversity plays in it."
https://arkhaven.substack.com/p/marvel-studios-the-autopsy
https://thedirect.com/article/marvel-mcu-success-characters-global