@sickburnbro Delegate to doctors and parents. Also end all of the programs that give doctors and hospitals kickbacks for pushing vaccines. If the vaccines are that great, it shouldn't be difficult to convince doctors to recommend them.
@Rocket it's like I was saying - if a company wants legal immunity for a vaccine, they should provide it at no financial benefit - should be simple if it is that good.
If it's an established vaccine, the risk profile should be known and you should be able to charge based on risk to company.
If it's an established vaccine, the risk profile should be known and you should be able to charge based on risk to company.
>the risk profile should be known and you should be able to charge based on risk to company.
Exactly this. This would force the drug company to conduct studies end establish the true risk profile. Not the fake one sided studies they do today that in the end include only the studies that are positive for their drugs.
If they wanted to charge more then they'd have to publish a worse risk profile which would make people avoid their crap. There'd be incentives to be truthful. Not to over or underplay risk.
Exactly this. This would force the drug company to conduct studies end establish the true risk profile. Not the fake one sided studies they do today that in the end include only the studies that are positive for their drugs.
If they wanted to charge more then they'd have to publish a worse risk profile which would make people avoid their crap. There'd be incentives to be truthful. Not to over or underplay risk.
"No! Not that kind of capitalism! We didn't lobby for this!"
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0