FBXL Social

Great take!
Also, Biblical and godly self-control has nothing to do with stoicism, Buddhism, or some other suppression of passions. It's ordering them in the right place and to the right cause.

@SuperSnekFriend the Bible isn't really mentioned in the twitter screenshot here but you'd be hard-pressed to not find some instance of rent garments and weeping in many of its books and it's generally a step in the right direction.

@SuperSnekFriend - You don't hate Andrew Tate enough. You think you do, but you don't.

@SuperSnekFriend It's an element of Victorian culture that has stuck around. Even back in the early 19th century men acted quite more emotionally when it came to tragedy: the death of Nelson being a good example.

@SuperSnekFriend Andrew Tate doesn't cry because he is a callous man who is likely a psychopath and only cares about himself

@SuperSnekFriend Idk if you have ever watched Barry Lyndon but the fact that Kubrick went out of his way to make the male characters act like they were a part of 18th century society, with its emotional norms and customs, when it could easily gone down the route of generic historical "acting" shows the care he had for the craft. Even now so few works actually show the real historical attitudes that people actually had.

@wgiwf @SuperSnekFriend - Tolkien channeled that earlier emotion in The Lord of the Rings across multiple scenes. The one most people are familiar with (since they only watched the execrable movies) was The Fellowship's breakdown after they lost Gandalf.

Its just a theory, and maybe I'm 100% off base, but I'd bet the 'stoic' element creeped in because of the growing Feminism movement. Think about everything women TOOK from men: we can't show emotion, else they will think we're weak. We can't have our own spaces because that's 'sexist'. They 100% pushed the idea that Men cannot have close male platonic friendships because it was 'fag behavior'. They are the ones that have poisoned the well for Western civilization.

> They 100% pushed the idea that Men cannot have close male platonic friendships because it was 'fag behavior'.
@David I think it's just zoomer's confusion about sexuality and women's fascination with two men having strong bonds, that causes them to self insert as one of them, so it turns into her sexual fantasy. I don't think i've ever encountered a serious notion that having a friend is gay. I think it's just media lacking depiction of any male friendships, that don't have a gay subtext, but that's because it's a profitable fanservice for women

@draw - No, this is something that's been around a lot longer. I can remember it growing up in the 70s and 80s. Its just more overt now. It really ramped up as women invaded every facet of men's private spaces. Its a specific kind of narcissism that you find among radical feminists.

@bleedingphoenix
It always goes hard whenever you see it the Bible.
We should revitalize that practice, maybe.

@branman65 @SuperSnekFriend makes sense hes a mudslime

@SuperSnekFriend @bleedingphoenix The Bible is the most based book in the history of humanity.

Also these men all wept in front of their peers. We men do not abuse one's tears. Only women do this.

@SuperSnekFriend whatever Tate said, do the opposite.

>Husle academy
Live frugal
>Fuck lots of women
Volcel
>What color is your Bugatti?
What color is your father?

@Bunsen @bleedingphoenix