Through a different lens, fascism is closer to what they want than a sort of pre-modern pluralistic liberalism. That doesn't even have a suffocating Omnistate! And they'd get rid of the church with all its pesky rules that aren't set by the suffocating Omnistate, and local cultures, with all their customs that aren't set by a suffocating Omnistate.
The opposite.
In the Soviet Union, the stalinists hated nobody more than the trotskyies. Both are retarded commies.
Fascism and national socialism are both modernist revolutionary movements. Mussolini was an important part of Italys socialist movement, and Hitler openly stated he utilized ideas directly from Marx. Marx was heavily informed by the French revolution under the Jacobins which led to the reign of terror and ultimately saw a monarch and aristocracy reinstalled in a couple decades. They're all kissing cousins.
The winning move against the modernists isn't to become another breed of modernist they hate, it's to surpass modernism and embrace all the things it rejects, such as transcendence, irrationality, and the inherent recognition that not only can't all things be centrally controlled, many things shouldn't be.
In the Soviet Union, the stalinists hated nobody more than the trotskyies. Both are retarded commies.
Fascism and national socialism are both modernist revolutionary movements. Mussolini was an important part of Italys socialist movement, and Hitler openly stated he utilized ideas directly from Marx. Marx was heavily informed by the French revolution under the Jacobins which led to the reign of terror and ultimately saw a monarch and aristocracy reinstalled in a couple decades. They're all kissing cousins.
The winning move against the modernists isn't to become another breed of modernist they hate, it's to surpass modernism and embrace all the things it rejects, such as transcendence, irrationality, and the inherent recognition that not only can't all things be centrally controlled, many things shouldn't be.
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 2