https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/30/americas/alberta-independence-trump-canada-intl-hnk
@ninafromcanadaeh Idiots wouldn't get independence if the scheme worked.
Alberta would be appropriated. It would be a territory until enough MAGAts move there to vote for statehood.
@ninafromcanadaeh Did the Quebecois go to a foreign power that was openly bragging about wanting to occupy Canada?
@ninafromcanadaeh That's not illegal activity then.
You can talk about secession; acting on it is a different matter.
@ninafromcanadaeh Not how the law works though. You have to commit an illegal act, not just talk about it.
@ninafromcanadaeh attempted murder requires action, not talk
"Self-determinationâthe freedom to choose for oneselfâis a key principle of the Charter of the United Nations."
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0
@ninafromcanadaeh Polling for separationism is low in Alberta. Profit from oil sands is high.
Quebec ran a referendum. Not a crime.
Asking for foreign money to support a coup is.
@ninafromcanadaeh Which is legal.
Has this broken your brain?
@ninafromcanadaeh I get that.
If it helps: Referenda are not legally binding unless the laws supports it becoming binding. I think about 1/2 of the propositions California passes have become law; others not. The courts tosses quite a few.
Think of it as "asking a question". What's done after the question is answered is what matters. If Quebec took up arms, that would not be legal - violation of sovereignty. If the Canadian government had invaded Quebec if they hadn't taken up arms, that would also be illegal (also a violation of sovereignty. but only under international law only enforceable at times).
But then it all depends on who wins.
Also I don't think the PQ are fully on board with the tranny stuff.