RT: https://poa.st/objects/518ec8f7-478d-4131-ae3e-e4c6cfbb6e11
acid or alk
@sapphire @madcuzbad @DC5FAN @DireGoy Akschually.... checks the map... yes.
@DC5FAN @madcuzbad @DireGoy Iranian and Italian genomes show significant genetic similarities due to shared ancient ancestry, particularly from Neolithic farmers and Iranian-related populations, but also exhibit distinct differences shaped by historical migrations and regional isolation.
Shared Ancestry: Both populations carry substantial Iranian Neolithic-related ancestry, which is a key component in Southern European genetic makeup. A 2022 genome-wide study found that Southern Italians are genetically closest to modern Greeks, and both share common genetic sources with ancient Iranian and Caucasus populations, modeled as a mixture of Anatolian Neolithic and Iranian Chalcolithic ancestries. Genetic Heterogeneity: The Iranian population is highly heterogeneous, with eleven ethnic groups showing distinct genetic profiles. A large 2019 genome-wide study revealed that Iranian Persians and Kurds exhibit higher in-group genetic variation than Germans, and that a core group (Central Iranian Cluster) has remained genetically stable for at least 5,000 years. In contrast, Italy shows regional gradients, with Northern Italians closer to Western Europeans (Spaniards, French) and Southern Italians more similar to Greeks and Levantine populations. Historical Influences: While Iranβs genetic profile reflects long-term continuity with minimal major migrations (except for limited Steppe and Caucasus input), Italyβs genome reflects multiple waves of migration, including Bronze Age Steppe pastoralists, North African admixture (especially in Sicily and Sardinia), and significant Eastern Mediterranean influx during the Roman Empireβparticularly from regions with Iranian Neolithic-rich ancestry. Phenotypic and Genetic Distinction: Despite shared Caucasoid ancestry, Italians and Iranians are phenotypically distinct on average, with differences rooted in genetic variation across both populations. However, Iranian ethnic groups (especially Persians, Kurds, and Azeris) are genetically closer to Italians than to many other global populations, including Arabs and Turks, based on autosomal DNA.
@sapphire @madcuzbad @DC5FAN @DireGoy Indo-Aryans were a branch of the broader Indo-European peoples who migrated into the Indian subcontinent from the Eurasian steppes (modern-day Ukraine and southern Russia) around 1300 BCE, not from Europe proper. They are distinct from later European Indo-Europeans, such as the Germanic or Italic groups, despite sharing a common linguistic and cultural ancestry.
The Aryan Migration Theory is supported by linguistic, archaeological, and genetic evidence:
Linguistic: The Rig Veda and the Avesta (Zoroastrian sacred text) share striking similarities in vocabulary, religious concepts (e.g., Deva vs. Ahura, Asura vs. Daeva), and ritual practices. Genetic: Modern Indian populations, especially upper-caste groups, show significant Steppe pastoralist ancestry (R1a haplogroup), with studies indicating up to 30% Steppe ancestry in many South Asian populations. This is consistent with migration from the Sintashta and Yamnaya cultures. Archaeological: Evidence of horse domestication, spoked wheels, and fire rituals appears in both the Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) and later Vedic culture, suggesting cultural continuity and interaction rather than total replacement. Contrast with European Indo-Europeans:
While both Indo-Aryans and European Indo-Europeans originated from the same steppe region, their paths diverged. Europeans developed distinct cultures (e.g., Celtic, Germanic), while Indo-Aryans settled in India and evolved Vedic religion, which later became Hinduism.
@sapphire @apropos @madcuzbad @DC5FAN @DireGoy Yeah, spanish are gypsies, no one in Europe consider them as whites.
Put another way: how many people speak an Iberian language today? They can't even prove Basque is related
@sapphire @madcuzbad @apropos @DC5FAN @DireGoy Now we are at the root of nigger/sand nigger mass migrations to Europe.
End goal is race mixing.
cirnosad's schizo theory with neanderthals is that we called all the men (no Y chromosome survivors) but not all the women, and that the inheritors are easily distinguished with simple physiognomy, and also that they are literal demons and literal aliens (and so are white people, from a different planet)
But genes aside, the Spanish kicked out the Muslims. The map of Muslim Spain doesn't prove that Spain is today a conquered part of the Spanish world, just like a map of American Indian tribes doesn't tell you about the genetics of white people in a state, and just like a neanderthal map doesn't tel you that Italians are neanderthals.
Neanderthals were vicious night-stalking cannibals, and any map has to be considered in light of "what if these guys were all ultimately genocided from this part of the map?"
what do the pre-Roman Iberians have to do with Romans?
>someone else's schizo theory
didn't come to me in my dream so I don't care its wrong
@apropos @sapphire @madcuzbad @DC5FAN @DireGoy Neanderthal genes in Italians vs. Europeans:
Modern Italians, like other Europeans, carry Neanderthal DNA, but the amount varies significantly across regions. While East Asians have the highest proportion of Neanderthal DNA (2.3β2.6%), followed by Europeans (1.8β2.4%), Italians show a geographically structured distribution of Neanderthal ancestry. Northern Italians tend to have higher levels of Neanderthal DNA compared to Southern Italians, reflecting broader European patterns where Northern Europeans have more Neanderthal ancestry than Southern Europeans.
Recent genomic studies confirm that Neanderthal ancestry in Italy is shaped by complex population history, including ancient migrations, admixture events, and regional genetic structure. The highest Neanderthal DNA ratios in the world have been found in central Italy (Tuscany), suggesting a unique genetic legacy in that region. However, Southern Italians show lower levels of Neanderthal DNA, possibly due to later admixture with populations from North Africa and the Middle East, which may have diluted Neanderthal ancestry.
Neanderthal genes contribute to traits like skin pigmentation, immune function, circadian rhythms, and bone density, but also increase risks for conditions such as diabetes, lupus, Crohnβs disease, and nicotine addiction. Despite these risks, Neanderthal DNA may have helped early humans adapt to new environments and diets.
In summary:
East Asians > Europeans > Africans in Neanderthal DNA percentage. Northern Italians > Southern Italians in Neanderthal ancestry. Tuscany has the highest Neanderthal DNA ratio globally. Neanderthal genes influence both beneficial and harmful traits in modern humans.
@sapphire @apropos @madcuzbad @DC5FAN @DireGoy I do not base my arguments on dreams.
@sapphire @apropos @madcuzbad @DC5FAN @DireGoy What I do not know, I have to ask from someone else. And You? Go dreaming?
Totally random guy with no influence though, so no way that any of the praise for neanderthal DNA might've come by him.
@sapphire @apropos @madcuzbad @DC5FAN @DireGoy All I have seen you base your own arguments on dreams, so far. Please could you be more spesific where you base your arguments, "because I say so" is not flying far enough in the conversations, nor counter argument that it is (((science))) and cannot be trusted. Otherwise I consider you as a pigeon playing the chess, tip over all the pawns, shit on the board, fly home and tell that you won the game.