@icedquinn @condret @mangeurdenuage @sun I don't think authoritarianism and censorship is the concern of people who would try to bring fascists or MLs into power
If you say it's not all Jews, just those that satisfy certain other properties, then maybe you have identified the properties that are the real problem.
"Give me the strength for the struggle that's ahead
Give me the patience to withstand the test
Give me the love I need for each and every enemy
Give me peace and serenity"
Give me the patience to withstand the test
Give me the love I need for each and every enemy
Give me peace and serenity"
@Zergling_man @strypey Which Jews? Every single one? Do someone's genes immediately put them in a criminal hivemind?
The Assembly Worker - Tales From The Otherhood
https://mirlo.space/the-assembly-worker/release/tales-from-the-otherhood
https://mirlo.space/the-assembly-worker/release/tales-from-the-otherhood
@mrsaturday @condret @mangeurdenuage I think we've lost track of what we were talking about a bit. You said:
> If you're going to advocate for the dehumanization of a class of people, you could at least provide a hard definition rather than "whatever I feel like." That just makes you even more of a tyrant than simply advocating for dehumanization of people does.
And I pointed out that the people who "simply advocate for dehumanization of people" advocate for far more dehumanization of people than condret did in the OP.
> If you're going to advocate for the dehumanization of a class of people, you could at least provide a hard definition rather than "whatever I feel like." That just makes you even more of a tyrant than simply advocating for dehumanization of people does.
And I pointed out that the people who "simply advocate for dehumanization of people" advocate for far more dehumanization of people than condret did in the OP.
@sun @condret @mangeurdenuage
>in the USA there are politicians that would for example take away the right to own guns or radically reduce our conception of freedom of speech, should they be procedurally barred from office,
Maybe they should. Liberty > democracy.
Not as certain about the gun thing as I am about the speech thing, but guns do seem useful in protecting civil liberties such as free speech in case the system fails (thinking mainly about the US here).
>where do you draw the line
I'm not sure. But you can ask that about anything. Doesn't mean it can't be done.
>in the USA there are politicians that would for example take away the right to own guns or radically reduce our conception of freedom of speech, should they be procedurally barred from office,
Maybe they should. Liberty > democracy.
Not as certain about the gun thing as I am about the speech thing, but guns do seem useful in protecting civil liberties such as free speech in case the system fails (thinking mainly about the US here).
>where do you draw the line
I'm not sure. But you can ask that about anything. Doesn't mean it can't be done.
@sun @condret @mangeurdenuage How did they come to power after that? I should probably read the history.
@sun @condret @mangeurdenuage did Germany ban the Nazis? I thought the banning came later, after the damage was done and they lost the war
@moffintosh the party member who was arrested for CP. Was it actually lolicon?
@moffintosh How so? Also, if he meant the people, not the ideology, he should have said “libertarians“, not “libertarianism“.