FBXL Social

Hyolobrika (left) | @Hyolobrika@social.fbxl.net

Predator of cinnamon rolls

Are those names for new memetokens you want to make?

I used to love rollmops

ROLLMOPS ROLLMOPS ROLLMOPS

>Also, what about Permombler? You have to host your own Permöller to maintain presence on both sides of the Fedi!
That's actually a good idea. Maybe I can make some friends with the normal people on the other side. Hopefully the zealots on the other side won't cancel me for bullshit reasons, or, if they cancel me for good reasons, I can effectively apologise and sort it all out.

>Do you intend to get something OpenWRT-compatible?
We're getting fibre now that my grandma's on Signal (long story). I hope the router they give us will do everything I want it to, either by installing a custom OS or otherwise.

Maybe not conquered, I mean

The Indo-Aryans did exist. And so did the Indus Valley/Harrapan civilisation they conquered (or maybe not? I thought they did).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Aryan_migrations

not A Normal Two so it doesn't have to be lonely?

works for me

@anemone A normal what?

Just bought an RPi 5 for use as a server.
Gonna put XMPP on it and invite my family.
Gotta get a more reliable router as well though.

@toiletpaper fetus killers, then.

@Kuenga @Furgar shut the fuck up

@Mitsu non

@une @toiletpaper what is true then?

What is so great about faith?

@toiletpaper @une Do you not have faith in paganism/heathenry then?

@toiletpaper Fair enough. I forgot about all that.

Stark is writing in the 1990s, and martyrology c. 1995 does not exactly cover itself in glory. At the time of writing, the most popular theory among scholars (claims Stark) was that the martyrs were masochists. He considers this dumb and offensive theory a natural consequence of historians being reluctant to accept anything that sounds too miraculous or amazing, and there being few other hard-headed rational explanations of the martyrs’ behavior (for some reason, the obvious one - that they believed in God and Heaven - impresses neither Stark’s foils nor himself). He sets out to build an alternative theory: the martyrs were rationally seeking the approval of their community.

it’s wrong because it’s offensive

Lmao

»