>but they barely ever managed to hit their target inflation of 2% per year.
I've got a bridge to sell you.
Got it -- I won't waste my time trying to deprogram someone who clearly doesn't care about being lied to if it's by a bureaucrat.
I've got a bridge to sell you.
Got it -- I won't waste my time trying to deprogram someone who clearly doesn't care about being lied to if it's by a bureaucrat.
That's a good point. As an example, the western worldview is that the world is ultimately a knowable, understandable, quantifiable thing. Under many worldviews, the world is something transient that can change at any moment into a fundamentally different thing on the whims of an alien, unknowable metaphysic, so it's a waste of time understanding the world.
As an example, the Arab muslims were some of the peak scientists of the short era they agreed with Christians that the world was the work of God and you could learn more about God by learning more about the world, but their fundamental ideology changed after a while to believe the world is made by God and can be changed at any time by God so learning about it is a waste.
As an example, the Arab muslims were some of the peak scientists of the short era they agreed with Christians that the world was the work of God and you could learn more about God by learning more about the world, but their fundamental ideology changed after a while to believe the world is made by God and can be changed at any time by God so learning about it is a waste.
😮
Yeah, that's a good example. "Oh, so you don't presuppose that you're alive, that you're on earth, that your perceptions of reality through your eyes and ears are accurate enough that you can make judgements based on those? That your mind is clear enough that you can use it to make judgements?"
Doesn't seem like a lot, but just the above isn't stuff you can just take for granted necessarily. If any of those presuppositions are wrong then you can't move forward with any conclusions!
Yeah, that's a good example. "Oh, so you don't presuppose that you're alive, that you're on earth, that your perceptions of reality through your eyes and ears are accurate enough that you can make judgements based on those? That your mind is clear enough that you can use it to make judgements?"
Doesn't seem like a lot, but just the above isn't stuff you can just take for granted necessarily. If any of those presuppositions are wrong then you can't move forward with any conclusions!
I like to think that I want to see opinions I disagree with, and I'm mutuals with people who I think prove that out. People I respect but nonetheless disagree with strongly on important things.
Thing is, opinions I disagree with need to have some grounding in reality, or it's just slamming my head against a brick wall! I'm not a teenager anymore, I don't want to just argue with people who are wrong on the Internet.
At least *try* to change my mind rather than just assuming you've already captured it and saying stuff that's divorced from reality, logic, and common sense, you know?
Thing is, opinions I disagree with need to have some grounding in reality, or it's just slamming my head against a brick wall! I'm not a teenager anymore, I don't want to just argue with people who are wrong on the Internet.
At least *try* to change my mind rather than just assuming you've already captured it and saying stuff that's divorced from reality, logic, and common sense, you know?
The economy keeps crashing over and over again after they promise it won't happen again. And quality of life keeps getting worse for the common man while it keeps getting better for the richest of the rich.
It should be a base assumption that even if we can't agree on what a better system looks like, the current system doesn't accomplish anything it claims to attempt. At best, it makes numbers look good so they can stab us in the back and tell us it's healthy to feel that sharp pain.
It should be a base assumption that even if we can't agree on what a better system looks like, the current system doesn't accomplish anything it claims to attempt. At best, it makes numbers look good so they can stab us in the back and tell us it's healthy to feel that sharp pain.
We've got our eye on you and your Rock and Roll music and blue jeans and comic books and talkie movies and...
So.... a judge imagines that something could potentially happen so jurors should take basic measures, and that means it absolutely will happen and you can attack the people who haven't done anything as if they did the thing?
Of course it does. I don't even know why I bothered asking.
Of course it does. I don't even know why I bothered asking.
Gaming press had some decent examples back in the day.
The problem is that it seems the brown nosers survived where the honest failed. :(
The problem is that it seems the brown nosers survived where the honest failed. :(
Sounds like a good choice to me.
If people want to turn off different features they should be allowed to.
If people want to turn off different features they should be allowed to.
New turing test "tell me how many people Mao's policies killed without telling me something "it's important to note"
Difficulty level: impossible
Difficulty level: impossible
Nextcloud news is S-tier. Completely changes how someone consumes news from multiple sources.
America pays for universal healthcare, it just doesn't get it.
What's going on with all that money being collected?
What's going on with all that money being collected?
I'm pretty shocked at the number of people casting shade at a guy while he literally holds a holy hand grenade.
I kinda like the idea of being able to just say "yeah, this user but without the images" without having to be an admin and do it for the whole instance using mrf
Tbf, of course you'd seek to dismiss first. If you thought you might be able to swing some dismissals on failure to state a claim or something that's just free wins.
