First trans world leader. The latest he can pull it off by is next October.
Did you know that there are only two prime ministers in history who have ever gotten divorces in office, and they are both named Trudeau? The first was his dad, the second is him.
Did you know that there are only two prime ministers in history who have ever gotten divorces in office, and they are both named Trudeau? The first was his dad, the second is him.
It's sad that the joke about the President of the Universe from Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy is often way too true.
We have an FBXL Social exclusive: anonymous sources familiar with Trump's thinking have confirmed that contrary to prior reports that he would be removing trans people from the military, he will be implementing a draft so all trans individuals will be forced into the military. From there he's going to send them all to Thailand to protect the strategic ladyboy reserve from attacks by the Chinese, whose reserve of this essential resource are significantly depleted after the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 in which they made significant use of those reserves in their fight against the global pandemic of unknown origins.
In order to facilitate this, Trump would utilize the selective service registry to find all the trans women who signed up at 18 as males, and to use the FBI to find and charge the trans men for failing to register on the selective service registry but will give sweetheart plea deals to drop all charges if they complete their service honorably. He reportedly said of the trans men caught in this scheme: "Your body my choice, boys! You should have known males need to apply after 18." (Experts we spoke to agree trans men are not legally required to or allowed to sign up for selective service)
We contacted trans rights organizations about this new development, and they expressed deep confusion at the matter, which admittedly was on-brand.
We also contacted Trump's transition team, and the spokeswoman said "What were you smoking when you came up with all this? Just from the loss of all our domestic Linux sysadmins alone such a plan would be catastrophic.". This damning non-denial gives strong support to our source's claims.
This has been an FBXL Social exclusive report. No, it's inappropriate to reveal our sources.
(It's actually the janitor at the FBXL office, who read a statement I prepared for him to read. But don't tell anyone. That's the source.)
In order to facilitate this, Trump would utilize the selective service registry to find all the trans women who signed up at 18 as males, and to use the FBI to find and charge the trans men for failing to register on the selective service registry but will give sweetheart plea deals to drop all charges if they complete their service honorably. He reportedly said of the trans men caught in this scheme: "Your body my choice, boys! You should have known males need to apply after 18." (Experts we spoke to agree trans men are not legally required to or allowed to sign up for selective service)
We contacted trans rights organizations about this new development, and they expressed deep confusion at the matter, which admittedly was on-brand.
We also contacted Trump's transition team, and the spokeswoman said "What were you smoking when you came up with all this? Just from the loss of all our domestic Linux sysadmins alone such a plan would be catastrophic.". This damning non-denial gives strong support to our source's claims.
This has been an FBXL Social exclusive report. No, it's inappropriate to reveal our sources.
(It's actually the janitor at the FBXL office, who read a statement I prepared for him to read. But don't tell anyone. That's the source.)
I'd actually accept that premise. It explains too much about how poor the ideology is. You can't tell me there isn't a smart ideology in there somewhere, but you also can't tell me what most people advocate for is it. It makes a lot more sense as a purely realpolitik construction because you couldn't build a coalition on the real thing.
To an extent I'd accept the same about the right, which has 8000 years of history but ends up focusing on a few hours of sound bites total.
To an extent I'd accept the same about the right, which has 8000 years of history but ends up focusing on a few hours of sound bites total.
The Bible is two parts:
"This is the model for how you live a good life, follow it or else. Here's a bunch of stories of people who did and did not follow this advice and what happened to them. Even here you can somewhat negotiate with God as Lot did in Soddom and Gamora. He also shows grace as with Israel's many failures, but such grace isn't as explicit as the second part."
And
"But God doesn't hate you, God loves you, so let's discuss how He understands you are a fallible human living in a broken world so He will show grace when you falter so long as you know you screwed up and you feel legitimately bad for it, but that by no means suggests you ought to accept or embrace sin. By the way, don't be like these assholes who focus on rule lawyering over being a good person. In the same way the first part demonstrates Grace, this part still demands one follow God's laws."
No part of the Bible is the hippy trippy boomer story about how you can do whatever you want whenever you want.
As with any matter theological, I have to point out that I'm not an authority and just a retard on the internet trying to make some sense out of the world and the long arc of human history.
"This is the model for how you live a good life, follow it or else. Here's a bunch of stories of people who did and did not follow this advice and what happened to them. Even here you can somewhat negotiate with God as Lot did in Soddom and Gamora. He also shows grace as with Israel's many failures, but such grace isn't as explicit as the second part."
And
"But God doesn't hate you, God loves you, so let's discuss how He understands you are a fallible human living in a broken world so He will show grace when you falter so long as you know you screwed up and you feel legitimately bad for it, but that by no means suggests you ought to accept or embrace sin. By the way, don't be like these assholes who focus on rule lawyering over being a good person. In the same way the first part demonstrates Grace, this part still demands one follow God's laws."
No part of the Bible is the hippy trippy boomer story about how you can do whatever you want whenever you want.
As with any matter theological, I have to point out that I'm not an authority and just a retard on the internet trying to make some sense out of the world and the long arc of human history.
The far left is always amusing.
1. They oppose "cultural imperialism" yet strive to impose their values on a foreign culture, in this case Japan. If you're going to impose your values on a foreign culture, why not really get in there and help make Afghanistan woke again?
They have a moral certitude that their ideology is the true and correct one and so spreading it is justified, but given that their ideology is based on postmodernism, it's a broken certitude -- If you are going to reject grand narratives and deconstruct their elements, why should that result in a new grand narrative? The answer is that it shouldn't, and orthodox progressivism as I've defined wokeness as in depth is built on a paradox that can't be solved.
2. They oppose "cultural appropriation" yet strive to appropriate light novels, manga, and anime to carry their woke message. If you're going to appropriate culture, why not choose something totally alien to the west, like making Mongolian throat singing woke? If you think about it, it's a lot more on brand.
Incidentally, some people sound like they're Mongolian throat singing when they burp, but I'm not opposed to a little cultural appropriation as long as it's in good fun!
1. They oppose "cultural imperialism" yet strive to impose their values on a foreign culture, in this case Japan. If you're going to impose your values on a foreign culture, why not really get in there and help make Afghanistan woke again?
They have a moral certitude that their ideology is the true and correct one and so spreading it is justified, but given that their ideology is based on postmodernism, it's a broken certitude -- If you are going to reject grand narratives and deconstruct their elements, why should that result in a new grand narrative? The answer is that it shouldn't, and orthodox progressivism as I've defined wokeness as in depth is built on a paradox that can't be solved.
2. They oppose "cultural appropriation" yet strive to appropriate light novels, manga, and anime to carry their woke message. If you're going to appropriate culture, why not choose something totally alien to the west, like making Mongolian throat singing woke? If you think about it, it's a lot more on brand.
Incidentally, some people sound like they're Mongolian throat singing when they burp, but I'm not opposed to a little cultural appropriation as long as it's in good fun!
Randomly, got stung by a wasp near my shed a couple years ago. This year I discovered the largest wasps nest I've ever seen I(about the size of a volley ball) in a hidden corner of the shed. Dead now, but it explains a lot.
This isn't how it's done in other countries. My kid is 3 and I think he had just your very basic shots, like 5 or so, and some of them were the same one multiple times. Not an unreasonable number like 32!
Considering that all the predictions about the unvaccinated were totally wrong, it definitely seems fishy.
Trump made a lot of mistakes his first term, I hope he's learned better this time around.
Trump made a lot of mistakes his first term, I hope he's learned better this time around.
https://youtu.be/IOaD-2IAym8
Great video as always by speech analyst Martin DeCoder.
One thing from Oprah's speech, she goes "what did you do to vote?" And the girl goes "I woke up at 7am" and Oprah goes "woooooow"
7am isn't woooooow, 5am is woooooow. 7am is the normal time a lot of people get up on the weekend without an alarm clock.
And if it was 4am, I'd be a little scared. Like, ain't nobody stopping you from voting come hell or high water!!
Great video as always by speech analyst Martin DeCoder.
One thing from Oprah's speech, she goes "what did you do to vote?" And the girl goes "I woke up at 7am" and Oprah goes "woooooow"
7am isn't woooooow, 5am is woooooow. 7am is the normal time a lot of people get up on the weekend without an alarm clock.
And if it was 4am, I'd be a little scared. Like, ain't nobody stopping you from voting come hell or high water!!
The climate changing can be a big deal -- one of the factors of the bronze age collapse was a change in climate that slowly made Mesopotamia stop being prime farmland and start being desert. A similar change in climate made northern Europe inhabitable for the first time, especially by farming civilizations.
Problem is none of this is based on reality, it's all histrionics to try to make people ignore the fact that their quality of life has been getting to a point that's so bad they're going to be the end of their genetic lines by focusing on some big political/environmental issues instead of the corrupt governments working together to hurt the common man.
Problem is none of this is based on reality, it's all histrionics to try to make people ignore the fact that their quality of life has been getting to a point that's so bad they're going to be the end of their genetic lines by focusing on some big political/environmental issues instead of the corrupt governments working together to hurt the common man.
Whether people like it or not, the fact that you're "allowed" to have one opinion and you'll be rewarded, and you're "not allowed" to have other opinions and your career and life will be destroyed means you're definitionally not doing science.
In proper science, the final arbiter of truth is reality. If you're acting as if the final arbiter is the state, you're doing propaganda, and if the final arbiter is some group of moral busibodies then you're doing theology.
Don't get me wrong, sometimes propaganda or theology can be noble pursuits, but what they aren't is science.
In proper science, the final arbiter of truth is reality. If you're acting as if the final arbiter is the state, you're doing propaganda, and if the final arbiter is some group of moral busibodies then you're doing theology.
Don't get me wrong, sometimes propaganda or theology can be noble pursuits, but what they aren't is science.
It has nothing to do with the presidency and everything to do with being a father.
Being the sort of father who did this was what led to having to be the sort of father who did this. He's not choosing family, he's signing his remaining son's death warrant as he no doubt has a thousand times before in other situations where there were a chance of consequences occurring.
Being the sort of father who did this was what led to having to be the sort of father who did this. He's not choosing family, he's signing his remaining son's death warrant as he no doubt has a thousand times before in other situations where there were a chance of consequences occurring.
For just over 100 you can get an hp t740 on eBay.
https://www.parkytowers.me.uk/thin/hp/t740/
I was giving it the side eye but I don't do fans.
https://www.parkytowers.me.uk/thin/hp/t740/
I was giving it the side eye but I don't do fans.
I can't imagine he hates his VP enough to make her president for a month and a half after embarrassingly losing the election to someone she called a fascist and whose media allies were all calling Hitler.
It's just too embarrassing for everyone involved.
It's just too embarrassing for everyone involved.