Oh.
Ohhhhhh..
Can't believe I didn't realize it was about ensuring favorable coverage rather than spamming the public.
Ohhhhhh..
Can't believe I didn't realize it was about ensuring favorable coverage rather than spamming the public.
Huh?
"We acknowledge this land was stolen but we're here anyway to make a bunch of money off it."
Doesn't seem very empathic
"We acknowledge this land was stolen but we're here anyway to make a bunch of money off it."
Doesn't seem very empathic
Hosting requirements increase infinitely over time.
Would be nice if you could say "only keep 2 weeks of content"
Would be nice if you could say "only keep 2 weeks of content"
The ideal scenario is close to the fediverse, but I think both sides get it a little wrong.
You don't have to choose between all or nothing. The best balance is to treat each instance as a mini community. It isn't about free speech, it's about freedom of association. Each instance should focus on curating a culture, but activity pub connects all the instances allowing the freedom of ideas.
The biggest limitation right now is hosting.
You don't have to choose between all or nothing. The best balance is to treat each instance as a mini community. It isn't about free speech, it's about freedom of association. Each instance should focus on curating a culture, but activity pub connects all the instances allowing the freedom of ideas.
The biggest limitation right now is hosting.
We're seeing culture shift in real time.
If Bluesky is just the comfy hug box for these people that X used to be, the people who matter will be on X if it is just a choice between the two.
If only there were some other third option with a decentralized protocol..
If Bluesky is just the comfy hug box for these people that X used to be, the people who matter will be on X if it is just a choice between the two.
If only there were some other third option with a decentralized protocol..
I don't understand what problem bluesky solves.
Seems like more of the same, with just a different choice of who will decide what is censored.
Seems like more of the same, with just a different choice of who will decide what is censored.
Seems more like certain protests are allowed/encouraged and others are crushed.
Just depends on who gains power from the protest.
Just depends on who gains power from the protest.
Pretty sure politics have been like this since the dawn of time.
Practically speaking the average person doesn't pay attention, so you have to put in the work now for 2026.
Practically speaking the average person doesn't pay attention, so you have to put in the work now for 2026.
A sane country would be investigating the Epstein list.
A serious country would be investigating why Epstein's island existed.
A serious country would be investigating why Epstein's island existed.
Ah sweet, can't wait for the militarization of AI!
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/07/trump-allies-want-to-make-america-first-in-ai-with-sweeping-executive-order/
> The draft order, obtained by the Post, outlines a series of "Manhattan Projects" to advance military AI capabilities.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/07/trump-allies-want-to-make-america-first-in-ai-with-sweeping-executive-order/
> The draft order, obtained by the Post, outlines a series of "Manhattan Projects" to advance military AI capabilities.
